Okay I new here to site so I thought I make first publication to inquierers in world. here at site is ok thank.
I make satement about david hume what he says as words wisdome.
He says this he says,
There not a right in the world my friend so you are best find it on your own.
He says this on death bead so i thouth that i tell the world here how it is casse such that this is issue of what is teh I and so i is i and i mean i right? Yes that is so. Then that mean that I is I is I is I and so that mean despite the hegelean assersion of optimsim and so on, and philoepoher after he the truth not ever bee foun so u know what that mean people? me I do and I make a philosophy post about thi s below i shal clarify why i post this in philosophy in science site.
Philosophy is a discourse on the nature of the mind and the consciousness and the attaining wisdomes and stuffs about that. It related to much myths and legends and most philosophy book talk abouts thats ok? Good.
Now that is generally what philosophy is. So that mean science much different then philosophys ok? Good.
But see philosophy is distinct in clear perecise way from sciences kuz the sciences r like that k? Good. Philosophy do no mesh with science- science the hard fact- philosohy the cold truth. K? Understand the assersion here? Philosophy is most logic but most actually wisdom and truths about lifes k?
That what philosophy is it talk about state and wisdom etc ok GOod. It mostly concern with wisdoms k good.
Now that u know what philosophy is and what science is then 'u can understand how to apply wisdoms to ur rselfelfs k good. Now my assersion is about I and hume say that I is worthless wont find no truth. Belo I will elaborate.
The I as u know is distinct from perception in that it's validated by itself and for itself alone. If u consider a man remote or distinct from the realm of society to be precise all you really arrive to is the distinction of man from or man and society. U can place the I in the invidiaual as a construct in the self at least.
This is the nature of man and in his state of abandonment his choices he makes are very very very very very imoprtant and u will never discovery how muchs that that is true.
Now when you consider this you get into the thouhts of the philosopher like I talk about. One of them say that the principal of right is distinct from the real world in terms of conception- that is tos ay really - perception.
Now if you think abou the notion and the discoverys of perception with regard tot he mind and its relation to reality you only get one thing. Not two or four.
The most percept concept of mind is the "I" which is the complex of your structure in my opinion. The mind and concstruct there is apt or willing or subjetable to a psychology of sorts mostly explained but never fully described.... Now this wisdom is not meant for everybody and usually a person try to explain it they proceed to explain something already understood. That infact has a category and its called BRACKETING in other words in terms of wisdom the words that people present are able to be bracketed. So that knowledge itself is secured. This is a very advanced princiapl though.
When it gets into the thought that u cant comprehend full wisdom kuz it is like that u cant ever search for truths so i will eave this as consideration.
When u get to this point in the thought level you say. What I am about to present.
The I is worthless. There is no hope. You may as well abandon bed rock. You will never find truth. It does not exist. You are remote from that truth. And always will be. It never exists and never will. No wisdom in the world can account to the conception of the I. The I's wisdom is exempt from consideration comopletely.
This is the assersion and it's scientific so I thought I would publish it in way of an inquirer would normally publish something. And in this instance it is only that the I is remote but not removable or anything else because you cannot formulate or conceptualize knowledge or anything in to the eye. Knowledge is COMPLETE. That is to say, KNOWLDGE IS ABSOLUTE. It is in a way the only and highest power of mans conception and his conceptual abilities. So the I in this way becomes the absolute way of presenting to yourself the world. From this conception,- it is completly a vain persuit.
Have a nice day.
jessc
I make satement about david hume what he says as words wisdome.
He says this he says,
There not a right in the world my friend so you are best find it on your own.
He says this on death bead so i thouth that i tell the world here how it is casse such that this is issue of what is teh I and so i is i and i mean i right? Yes that is so. Then that mean that I is I is I is I and so that mean despite the hegelean assersion of optimsim and so on, and philoepoher after he the truth not ever bee foun so u know what that mean people? me I do and I make a philosophy post about thi s below i shal clarify why i post this in philosophy in science site.
Philosophy is a discourse on the nature of the mind and the consciousness and the attaining wisdomes and stuffs about that. It related to much myths and legends and most philosophy book talk abouts thats ok? Good.
Now that is generally what philosophy is. So that mean science much different then philosophys ok? Good.
But see philosophy is distinct in clear perecise way from sciences kuz the sciences r like that k? Good. Philosophy do no mesh with science- science the hard fact- philosohy the cold truth. K? Understand the assersion here? Philosophy is most logic but most actually wisdom and truths about lifes k?
That what philosophy is it talk about state and wisdom etc ok GOod. It mostly concern with wisdoms k good.
Now that u know what philosophy is and what science is then 'u can understand how to apply wisdoms to ur rselfelfs k good. Now my assersion is about I and hume say that I is worthless wont find no truth. Belo I will elaborate.
The I as u know is distinct from perception in that it's validated by itself and for itself alone. If u consider a man remote or distinct from the realm of society to be precise all you really arrive to is the distinction of man from or man and society. U can place the I in the invidiaual as a construct in the self at least.
This is the nature of man and in his state of abandonment his choices he makes are very very very very very imoprtant and u will never discovery how muchs that that is true.
Now when you consider this you get into the thouhts of the philosopher like I talk about. One of them say that the principal of right is distinct from the real world in terms of conception- that is tos ay really - perception.
Now if you think abou the notion and the discoverys of perception with regard tot he mind and its relation to reality you only get one thing. Not two or four.
The most percept concept of mind is the "I" which is the complex of your structure in my opinion. The mind and concstruct there is apt or willing or subjetable to a psychology of sorts mostly explained but never fully described.... Now this wisdom is not meant for everybody and usually a person try to explain it they proceed to explain something already understood. That infact has a category and its called BRACKETING in other words in terms of wisdom the words that people present are able to be bracketed. So that knowledge itself is secured. This is a very advanced princiapl though.
When it gets into the thought that u cant comprehend full wisdom kuz it is like that u cant ever search for truths so i will eave this as consideration.
When u get to this point in the thought level you say. What I am about to present.
The I is worthless. There is no hope. You may as well abandon bed rock. You will never find truth. It does not exist. You are remote from that truth. And always will be. It never exists and never will. No wisdom in the world can account to the conception of the I. The I's wisdom is exempt from consideration comopletely.
This is the assersion and it's scientific so I thought I would publish it in way of an inquirer would normally publish something. And in this instance it is only that the I is remote but not removable or anything else because you cannot formulate or conceptualize knowledge or anything in to the eye. Knowledge is COMPLETE. That is to say, KNOWLDGE IS ABSOLUTE. It is in a way the only and highest power of mans conception and his conceptual abilities. So the I in this way becomes the absolute way of presenting to yourself the world. From this conception,- it is completly a vain persuit.
Have a nice day.
jessc