This is an attempt to rationalize irrational "condition-sets" based on false observations and conclusions, using mathematical extrapolations as "proof"...numbers are never

wrong, and therefore a theoretical proposition is "right!" Or least "right" enough. Forty years of discourse, experiments, observations, extrapolations concerning energy and

matter have NEVER come to fruition...because there is no "tree to bear fruit". There never was any quantum "tree"...only a Cheshire cat's "grin".

How can I dare to write this? Do I "know some great secret?" Do I have some "overwhelming proof" that modern theoretical physics is "wrong?" No...I have no proof of anything,

nor am I privy to some "hidden secret". All I have done is read...a lot. And apply logic to whatever I read.

For instance, there is no proof to support the contentions of Hawking's "ultimate gravity"...and yet it is accepted as "Holy Writ" by many. Why? By what mechanisms of

action can "increasing the density of mass results in an exponential of gravity". The idea of this is completely untenable.

This concept-model of "ultimate gravity" seems a parallel of "The Emperor's New Clothes"...in that all of logic and proportion have been discarded.

(Never mind Einstein and "Relativity", just throw him and his quaint "know-nothing" ramblings into the "delete" file)

Am I saying I'm "smarter" than Hawking? That I should occupy the "Newton" chair at Cambridge? No...I wouldn't want to be seated there in any event. Einstein will object, and

rightfully so! The "Chair" has been his for a hundred years.

What Hawking and others cannot "explain" is just "how" does a mass of matter, however dense, increase gravity beyond that with which the matter started with?

If one atom possesses one "unit" of inherent gravity...then how can any circumstance dictate that an atom can have "more?" It is irrelevant "how many" atoms there are

in-place...each has an inherent threshold, a threshold that cannot be exceeded!

True enough, "more atoms equal more gravity"...yet Hawking and many others maintain that, at least from observation and supposition, that "gravity" is, in effect, being

"supercharged" into the same AMOUNT of atoms!!! The "dense mass" is creating MORE gravity from the same amount of atoms.

(the only way this could happen is to suspend every known "rule" of physics...relativity? Gone. Logic? Gone. Avogadro's "number?" Gone. The "Co-invariance Principle?" Gone.

Lorentz "Principles?" Gone...etc. Only mathematical "proofs" remain, based on false premises)

What do I offer as "proof?" That Hawking, et. al. are "wrong?"

I offer our Solar System. That is my "proof" or contention, or theory, or whatever the "scientists" choose to call it.

The Earth and the Moon are VALID "proofs" of gravity with regard to matter and mass. "Celestial Mechanics" is also a valid proof.

The fact that "everything in the known Universe has tendency to stay in the same place" is a valid proof. I have never read in fifty years of Stars, Planets or Moons becoming

deranged and heading off to Boca Raton for a vacation! There is NO proof of "exponential gravity", other than calculus formulas that prove you make any "assumption" a

"true thing" if you work the numbers right.

"All right" many will say. "How do you explain that "light" is being "bent back" by an immensely powerful gravimetric field from an "ultra-dense" body?" I have no explanation,

nor do I need one...and the reason is simple.

There is no light being emitted from a "blackbody" mass. There is NO LIGHT to see, and that is why none is seen.

It may well be that the compositional mass of a given structure is no longer able to "emit" light because the conditions necessary are no longer present...the state of

hyper-thermic excitation is not great enough to serve as a "causation for the emission of light".

The conditions that cause the emission of light are NOT present. Just that simple.

"But what of this...and that...and the other "thing"...how do you explain them?

I can't...and neither can anyone else.

(Thanks for reading!) ...in case someone wants to "ban" me for heresy...remember, this is supposed to be the "right place" for "woo".