A few Apollo Hoax videos that disappeared are back

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's hear all of the pro-Apollo posters analyse this.

The Apollo (13) Hoax Revisited

This is unbelievably simple. The Moon reflects on average 12% of infrared received. At zenith it is radiating all that heat towards the Lunar module, it is also conducting some through the legs. The collective heat from the Command Module and Lunar Module together would overheat the cabin very quickly, so there is more temperature control.

No checkmate, just basic physics. Try not to spam your off topic videos in other threads!
 
This is unbelievably simple. The Moon reflects on average 12% of infrared received. At zenith it is radiating all that heat towards the Lunar module, it is also conducting some through the legs. The collective heat from the Command Module and Lunar Module together would overheat the cabin very quickly, so there is more temperature control.
This would have to be proven mathematically. What you posted falls far short of being proof.
 
You see that little picture to the left of my post, everyone on here can see the tread pattern clearly.

That comes from this video.

Apollo 15 Digging a trench
(2:40 time mark)


We would have to see an overhead view of it to know if it's as fine as this one.
https://wp-assets.futurism.com/2019/02/lawyer-sell-apollo-moon-footprints-600x315.png

We can't tell if it only has the detail that this print has.

MoonFaker: Footprints On The Moon Set, Ralph René Was Correct! PART 1
(6:32 time mark)


Anyway, there's a ton of other proof that the missions were faked so this is really a moot point.
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/did-we-go-to-the-moon.134682/page-2#post-3151173
 
My eyes tell me there is surface discolouration that spreads and stops in front of him at the point he lands. My eyes tell me there is a clear parabolic arc of dust smack in between his boots - it goes up and comes down in line with his jump. There is just enough not dispersed at the top of the jump to see it is quite definitely falling in unison with him.

If you put it on full screen and set the speed to .25, it can be seen that the dust in your captured frame does indeed fall back down before the astronaut does.

The Apollo Moon Jump Salute Refute
https://www.brighteon.com/612d782a-9223-4698-99ac-3eb337ceedf5
 
This would have to be proven mathematically. What you posted falls far short of being proof.

Prove what mathematically?

http://lunarpedia.org/index.php?tit...do for the,Sun, so we never see it from Earth.

"For the Moon, the average albedo for the solar spectrum across the lunar surface is 0.12"

https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/features/EnergyBalance/page2.php

"The average intensity of solar energy reaching the top of the atmosphere directly facing the Sun is about 1,360 watts per square meter"

1,360 * .12 = 163 watts being reflected per square meter!! That doesn't include conducted heat through the legs.

The trouble with you is that you have not the slightest idea about science and not the slightest ability to assess anything honestly.
 
If you put it on full screen and set the speed to .25, it can be seen that the dust in your captured frame does indeed fall back down before the astronaut does.

Oh and the other trouble with you is that you are a quite appalling liar.

Jump9551efe255133f02.gif
Parabola.png


You CANNOT "put it on full screen" or slow it down - it is a gif!! Any honest eyes can view the parabolic arc between his boots and see it rise in time and begin to fall in time. This obviously doesn't include those in repetitious denial. Enhanced and slowed:

cosmored-the-liar.gif


Totally and painfully obvious.
 
That comes from this video.

Apollo 15 Digging a trench
(2:40 time mark)


We would have to see an overhead view of it to know if it's as fine as this one.

No, really "we" wouldn't. You are in denial. It is a clear and obvious print being made at the same point as fine dust is kicked a ridiculous distance from a tiny boot movement! We can see the tread pattern very obviously. The idiot Jarrah White's "experiment" is unable to produce any print at all in a lunar dust replicant.

We can't tell if it only has the detail that this print has.

Yes "we" can. That is a deliberately staged photo opportunity. Oh and just so you know, Ralph Rene was a total imbecile.

Anyway, there's a ton of other proof that the missions were faked so this is really a moot point.

It is not a moot point. Every rock solid un-debunkable piece of proof we landed on the Moon is discarded by you, because you are a coward. Every single piece of your useless wall of spam debunked is also ignored by you. You will avoid this next question at all costs.

Without referring to your wall of spam, any Youtube idiot video or some conspiracy buffoon website, in your own words - YOUR OWN WORDS. list your top 5 pieces from your "ton of other proof"!!
 
Last edited:
Without referring to your wall of spam, any Youtube idiot video or some conspiracy buffoon website, in your own words - YOUR OWN WORDS. list your top 5 pieces from your "ton of other proof"!!

A lot of my own words are in here.
https://www.giraffeboards.com/showthread.php?t=31034

The moderator banned me and changed the title of the thread (see post #561).

A lot of the links in post #1 are dead but the fresh ones are on later pages.

edit
-------------------------------------

I was looking through that thread and I found some stuff I'd forgotten about.
https://ufospotlight.wordpress.com/2017/06/28/3848/
https://www.giraffeboards.com/showpost.php?p=1290961&postcount=170
http://www.moonfaker.com/documents/Metapedia-Moon-Hoax/
http://theconspiracyzone.podcastpeople.com/posts/27709
https://www.giraffeboards.com/showpost.php?p=1470560&postcount=266
 
Last edited:
A lot of my own words are in here.
https://www.giraffeboards.com/showthread.php?t=31034

The moderator banned me and changed the title of the thread (see post #561).
That moderator is needed here. How many other forums have you been banned from FF?
What for? spamming? lying? ignoring the overwhelming evidence in favour of your hear say nonsense?
And no, I still havn't watched any of your contrived video u tubes, as your history preaching nonsensical crap and lies, speaks for itself.
 
I put the video on full screen and slowed it down. I think that was pretty clear in post #44.

Listen very carefully. You are lying, I know you are lying and every person reading this knows it. It is very clear and obvious from the slowed down enhanced gif that there is a parabolic arc of dust between his boots that clearly and without any doubt falls as he does. You are avoiding it:

cosmored-the-liar.gif



A lot of my own words are in here.

Without referring to your wall of spam, any Youtube idiot video or some conspiracy buffoon website, in your own words - YOUR OWN WORDS. list your top 5 pieces from your "ton of other proof"!!

HERE!!! In a list, 5 bullet points, your best evidence.

You're not going to do it are you, because once you do you open up your tactic of throwing shit at a wall and hoping some sticks.

The moderator banned me and changed the title of the thread (see post #561).

You should be banned from the internet, you are a public nuisance. You tell so many lies and evade so many things you must be quite mad. If I was a moderator here, you would be in a thread all of your entitled "My rubber room".
 
How about this?

You really want to table those stupid claims as your top 5 do you? That is some real dumb shit.

"Without referring to your wall of spam, any Youtube idiot video or some conspiracy buffoon website, in your own words - YOUR OWN WORDS. list your top 5 pieces from your "ton of other proof"!!

HERE!!! In a list, 5 bullet points, your best evidence."



Which part of the word "HERE" is confusing you!!?


 
I could copy and paste the info here but what's the point? You can read it there just as easily. Why should I take the trouble?
 
Mod Note

How about this?
https://forum.cosmoquest.org/showth...pollo-footage-was-filmed-in-air-here-on-earth
https://forum.cosmoquest.org/showthread.php?169367-Faking-Being-Halfway-to-the-Moon

I was going to post my big list there but I figured it would just get deleted so I made a thread with a few bullet points.

Why are you advertising other forums on this site?

Secondly, why are you posting links from other forums where you are literally outed as a troll and where they referred to your so called evidence as being pure and utter crap? I guess that explains why they banned you.. You do realise that your links aren't helping you, right?
 
Why are you advertising other forums on this site?
My intent wasn't to advertise; he wanted a list and those were ready-made lists. It would have taken me half an hour to post all that stuff. I did it to save time.

Secondly, why are you posting links from other forums where you are literally outed as a troll and where they referred to your so called evidence as being pure and utter crap?
I don't think this reflects reality. I think those posters are paid sophists* who know the moon missions were faked as well as the hoax-believers do. Paid sophists have the attitude that they're winning a debate the whole time they're losing. I think they banned me because their success rate at making the viewers think the missions were real was close to zero.


*
https://www.clubconspiracy.com/counter-intellegience-tricks-and-techniques-t4702.html
 
My intent wasn't to advertise; he wanted a list and those were ready-made lists. It would have taken me half an hour to post all that stuff. I did it to save time.

That is a lie. It will take quite literally 5 minutes to type 5 bullet points with a simple link to your wall of spam.

I don't think / I think / I think

Nobody cares what you think. You are a dishonest troll who avoids evidence.

Five simple proofs:

  • On the Jump Salute, the dust between his boots shows he cannot be on wire support. This proves he must be in low gravity.
  • On Gene Cernan's approach to the rover, soil he kicks lands at the same time as he does. This proves he is not on wire support and must be in low gravity.
  • On the Digging a Trench video soil ejected will only drop at Earth freefall when the speed of the video is adjusted to 245%. Motion looks absurd, proving it must be running at the correct speed at 100%.
  • 842lbs of peer reviewed lunar samples, including 3 metre core samples. Impossible to fake, not meteorites and not from Earth.
  • On the idiotic film American Moon a section shows a flat surface falling with no dust disturbance in the direction of fall. This proves they are in a vacuum and in a considerably massive one!

There you go, took me 5 minutes and you have no honest answer to any of those - all of them prove we landed on the Moon.
 
Mod Note

My intent wasn't to advertise;
And yet here we are..

You advertising links to other forums, encouraging users to go there to read it there, instead of you putting in the legwork and actually posting your responses, with evidence [cough] here.


he wanted a list and those were ready-made lists.
But they weren't lists.

All you linked was to another forum, where some dumbass mouth breathing foil hat wearing yokel linked youtube videos instead of actual scientific research and data to back up his claims.


It would have taken me half an hour to post all that stuff. I did it to save time.
No, you didn't.

You linked to another forum because you are lazy for starters.

There is zero content in what you linked. It was, and I quote "Gish Gallop of willfully ignorant observations"..

Secondly, there have been numerous threads about the conspiracies by morons about how they think the moon landing was fake, all of which has been debunked, all of which have been closed because they have been debunked.

So I have to ask, why did you think it was acceptable to open yet another one with the same rubbish as the previous ones?

And worse still, you started this one and peppered it with links to other forums, asking readers here to go to these other sites to read it, where the dumbass who posted it there is banned for being, well, a conspiracy laden fool...?


I don't think this reflects reality.
Dude, you think everything is fake.

So I don't think your definition of reality matches that of reality.


I think those posters are paid sophists* who know the moon missions were faked as well as the hoax-believers do.
At some point, it will sink in that it's not everyone else, but you..

Paid sophists have the attitude that they're winning a debate the whole time they're losing. I think they banned me because their success rate at making the viewers think the missions were real was close to zero.
I'm not even going to bother pointing out the irony here.

There is a mountain of evidence that details just how the conspiracy is wrong. Forcing people to rehash it over and over again is kinda boring and dumb.

Linking to other forums to the idiocy of others as evidence or proof is equally boring and dumb and also not the done thing on any forum.

Reopening threads that have essentially been closed in the past, and then encouraging people to basically go elsewhere..

You not only interfered with moderation by starting yet another thread on this subject, when it was already closed, but you did it and advertised another website.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top