A declaration and chaklenge to Alphanumeric

[Quantum Quack]

My Pm to Alphanumeric after recieving correspondance today:

Alphanumeric, I am required to advise you that any correspondance you have with me or I send to you will be available for public review upon my descretion.

Is that clear?
============
There is no question about your intellectual capacity to disect and understand complex mathematics, calculus and physics in general. regardless of any qualifications you may or may not have acheived,

It is the abuse of that "gift" that is in question.

Your need to belittle your imaginary opposition can only be seen as a demonstration of a fundamental issue that you hold in your being somehow.

I shall offer a challenge to you :
Write a new [no copy and paste allowed] 500 word review of your opinion of R Feynmans intellectual challenge and success.
I and others would be very interested in how you manage to avoid what appears to be a compulsion in using your belittleing tactics against R Feynman.

==========================================

I shall use this thread also, if allowed. to post any slanderous, defamation. belittling commmentary from Alphanumeric here. [that which is in breach of the forum rules]
and maybe we can work out how this "illegal" behaviour has been allowed to continue for so long for I am sure if not for the inexplicable he woud not have been.

The strategy is simple:

Based on the principle that abuse of another person by a person can only be sustained under the veil of privacy and secrecy. Privacy and secrecy is a priviledge earned and not a right. Fortunately most people earn it with out problem. If I am seen as abusive I wish to know this, as I seek not to abuse anyone [Alphanumeric included] so feel free to post any abusive posts that I may make.
And as it appears the rules of this forum are being waived regarding Alphanumerics abusive behaviour this action becomes necessary to highlight said waiving of the rules.

I. Unacceptable behaviour that may result in a temporary or permanent ban
Personal attacks, threats and stalking
2. A personal attack on another member usually involves the word ‘you’, express or implied by context, combined with a negative comment. Attacks on another member (known as ad hominem attacks), as opposed to criticisms of his or her arguments, are not tolerated. Childish name-calling, such as referring to a member as a ‘moron’, ‘twit’, or ‘idiot’, is one obvious example of a personal attack.

and for over 2 years there has been ample evidence for these rules to be applied in the case of Alphanumerics postings as a member and as a moderator.
And no... I am not recommending banning Alphanumeric nor am I calling for a change in the rules that favours inappropriate moderator behaviour.
I am merely wishing to allow understanding of how insideous psycho mental health issues pervade not just here but globally.
I actualy like Alphanumeric and wish only that his recovery from what ever it is that is twisting his personality, be swift and sound.

What action needs to be taken is left entirely up to the super mods and administration who have a vested interest in the future of this board.

 

[Quantum Quack]

http://www.sciforums.com/showthread...s-are-trolling-and-treating-me-unfairly/page7
Alphanumeric: post #113

You're being so blatently dishonest I can only conclude you're doing it deliberately because the alternative is you have an IQ so low you might struggle to use a computer.

You are deliberately and consistently dishonest

You have a laughable delusion of entitlement when you have done nothing to help your own case and in fact have demonstrated that restricting your ability to post in the maths/physics main forum is clearly a good idea because you seem incapable of mature discussion.

You don't know any science

I'm sure you and QQ can spout ignorance at one another but that isn't something we'd allow in the main forum.

 

[Quantum Quack]

http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?114895-RealityCheck-moderators-are-trolling-and-treating-me-unfairly/page6
Post#103

Are you deliberately being ridiculously over the top or is it an accident?

I hope to god you're being deliberately ridiculous because that is moronic.

You've got from whining about perceived injustices to just flat out lying. Well done, you've demonstrated precisely the kind of person you are. Go you.

This set of fake platitudes you always spew doesn't make up for clear and deliberate lying. Saying 'mate' and 'no hard feelings' doesn't absolve you of being clearly dishonest. In the computer game Mass Effect someone makes a comment "Why is it when someone says 'With all due respect' they really mean 'Kiss my ass'". That's precisely how your vapid pleasantries appear. You aren't actually being polite, you're just shrouding dishonesty and misrepresentation in platitudes in the hopes it'll mask the frankly disgraceful amount of dishonesty you're spewing.

Your complaints about our supposed desire to prevent all non-professional discussion are ****ing ridiculous.

And rather than raising yourself to a minimal level of competency and honesty you're just digging yourself deeper. Your clear willingness to lie illustrates that clearly. Well done on sinking even lower. You must be so proud

 

[Quantum Quack]

http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?114895-RealityCheck-moderators-are-trolling-and-treating-me-unfairly/page6 post#111

And you continue with your dishonesty.

Pack it in with that particular line of dishonest misrepresentations else it'll amount to trolling on your part, you've been told more than once.

This revisionist history mentality you have is pretty dishonest of you.

I really can't tell if you're being deliberately obtuse or are just, to be blunt, thick

Whether you're being a deliberate troll by completely misrepresenting or ignoring what has been said to you and what events have occurred or you don't have sufficient comprehension skills to understand pretty simple things. I pointed out in a post earlier today how you've lied, just flat out lied, and you seem to have no qualms continuing to do so.

Are you resorting to this dishonest exaggeration and misrepresentation because you have a massive chip on your shoulder

despite you trying to do that collaborative theory of everything on PhysForums years ago which was laughably naive

Please explain how you reached such conclusions because they are so ridiculous and dishonest a representation of Prom and myself that it's disgusting.

 

[rpenner]

Alphanumeric, I am required to advise you that any correspondance you have with me or I send to you will be available for public review upon my descretion.

Advisement or no, this may be viewed as a threat to act in defiance of the forum rules in pursuit of a political agenda and thus is akin to terrorism. The forum rules state in part:

When posting:

• ...
• Do not post private messages to the public forums.

...
Netiquette

• ...
• Avoid engaging with members with whom you have a personality clash.

...
Behaviour that may get you banned

• ...
• Threats.
• Stalking.
• ...
• Repetitive or vexatious posting.
• Interfering with moderation.

http://www.sciforums.com/announcement.php?f=87

I shall use this thread also, if allowed. to post any slanderous, defamation. belittling commmentary from Alphanumeric here.

And this goes against the rule: "Complaints about individual moderators should be directed to administrators using Personal Messaging. Do not post them in the public forums."

If I am seen as abusive I wish to know this, ... so feel free to post any abusive posts that I may make.

Done.

 

[Quantum Quack]

Advisement or no, this may be viewed as a threat to act in defiance of the forum rules in pursuit of a political agenda and thus is akin to terrorism. The forum rules state in part: http://www.sciforums.com/announcement.php?f=87

And this goes against the rule: "Complaints about individual moderators should be directed to administrators using Personal Messaging. Do not post them in the public forums."

Done.

When the rules are applied as stringently to the moderators as it is to the standard members then the rules gain credibiity in a voluntary organisation such as this. This fora in particular is set up to faciitate amongst other things a complaints handling provsion. Privacy of PM's if notified correctly is fully legtimate as I do not wish Alphanumeric to take abusive use of the privacy provisions.
He is duely notified that any correspondece he has with me is subject to publication.... either here or any where...His vitriolic attacks must stop somewhere.
Transperancy of action is the name of the game...
and Alphanumerics "illegal" complaints against his fellow members have been recorded by way of his public posting with incredible frequency.

 

[Quantum Quack]

forum rules in pursuit of a political agenda and thus is akin to terrorism

akin to terrorism [chuckle].. Please explain what you mean by terrorism?

 

[Quantum Quack]

And this goes against the rule: "Complaints about individual moderators should be directed to administrators using Personal Messaging. Do not post them in the public forums."

@rpenner,
do you believe that formally posting infingements of the rules is a breach of the rules? why? Given the history of inaction involved.

 

[Quantum Quack]

I do not wish to suggest incompetance upon super mods or admin as I know why and how the posts have been allowed for so long to be made in a way that can not normally be acknowledged and acted upon.

 

[James R]

This personal attack thread is closed.

If you have an issue with a moderator, please contact an administrator by PM.