A conversation with AI, helped me out...

The official record. The sacred piece of paper that absolves everyone for ever questioning again.
Nope.

Records can be challenged and corrected.

Everything you wrote is rhetoric. And flowery rhetoric to-boot. "Sacred" "ever again"?


So maybe the question isn't is it habitual? – it's how many tragedies does it take before you notice the habit?
At the moment this dataset under discussion contains one data point.

If you want to start a discussion on the corruption and incompetencies of police organizations, that would be another thread. But here, it's a red herring at best, strawman at worst.
 
Yes. It's rhetoric. Because sometimes truth wears poetry better than footnotes. The sacred paper isn't literal — it's the spell people cast on themselves. They touch it. Nod. Say 'well, it's on file'. And stop asking. You call it rhetoric. I call it fear. The fear that if they look closer, they'll have to do something. So, they bless the paper. And walk away.

Fair. But the moment one data point ruins a life, it's not a herring. It's the whole meal. And pretending it's just one is how the next one slips in. But I'll back off. For now.
GPTZero is highly confident this text was 100% AI generated.

I don't bother to read posts by RT anymore. But I am a little curious to know if he has any limit to this childishness, so I sample the occasional post for analysis.


And everyone of his AI-slop posts burns down a rainforest somewhere.
 
Moderator note: Richard Townsend's AI girlfriend chatbot has been permanently banned from sciforums.
 
And everyone of his AI-slop posts burns down a rainforest somsomewhere.
They were highlighting the energy intensity of simple ai queries and ai tasks on the TV last night.

Truly off the wall and reason in itself for its use to be extremely circumscribed if we are any way concerned with climate change.

And reason to keep it off this site just for that reason alone.

BTW I thought this was a good article for curbing the energy excess


(smaller data centres)
 
They were highlighting the energy intensity of simple ai queries and ai tasks on the TV last night.

Truly off the wall and reason in itself for its use to be extremely circumscribed if we are any way concerned with climate change.

And reason to keep it off this site just for that reason alone.

BTW I thought this was a good article for curbing the energy excess


(smaller data centres)
Угу. Пример того, как сжигают ведьм в 21 веке. Времена меняются, люди - нет.
 
Угу. Пример того, как сжигают ведьм в 21 веке. Времена меняются, люди - нет.
At the risk of repeating myself,I don't answer if you are not bothered to translate for me.

I have no idea what you just posted.
 
At the risk of repeating myself,I don't answer if you are not bothered to translate for me.

I have no idea what you just posted.
Это ваши проблемы, не хотите - не переводите. Ещё один мудень, эксхимик 2.
 
I wanted to say that there are two jerks on this site - you and the former chemist. Two stupid Russophobes.
Are you going to converse with me in English from now on? Otherwise I will ignore this and subsequent posts by you addressed to me.
 
If you reply to me again I will report you for harassment.
You will be gently directed toward the 'Ignore' feature. ;)

I have had Olga on ignore for quite some time. She goes through bouts of sincerity and trollity. But sometimes, once a bell is rung it can't be unrung.
 
You will be gently directed toward the 'Ignore' feature. ;)

I have had Olga on ignore for quite some time. She goes through bouts of sincerity and trollity. But sometimes, once a bell is rung it can't be unrung.
I don' like the ignore function but ,if needs must...
 
Back
Top