9/11

psikeyhackr:

Concentrate, please. Answer the question I asked you: can concrete support loads? Yes or no?
 
psikeyhackr said:
To BELIEVE means to accept something as True, or False, without sufficient data.
Click to expand...
No. Believing just means accepting that it is true.

For example, I believe that Earth orbits the Sun. As it happens, I also have sufficient data to support that belief.
psikeyhackr said:
BELIEF is Stupid by Definition!
Click to expand...
But you believe all kinds of things. Why is that?
psikeyhackr said:
The Twin Towers did hold themselves up for a couple of decades. The designers had to figure out how to distribute the steel to accomplish that.
Click to expand...
Correct. I'm glad you have made this much progress, at least.
 
James R said:
Correct. I'm glad you have made this much progress, at least.
Click to expand...
I never said anything which contradicted that. I have been saying that the steel distribution data was necessary to analyze the problem all along.

This is just you projecting stupidity again, like bringing up Trump.

Believing a negative is just as much a belief as believing a positive.
 
psikeyhackr said:
steel distribution data was necessary to analyze the problem
Click to expand...
What problem? They designed it in the 1960s, built it in the 1970s, and they were fine till a fire destroyed it in 2001.

What is it you don't get? Seriously? I actually posted a video where the fire department were pushing people back because the building was buckling and about to fall.
Just as we explained about fire and materials.
 
psikeyhackr said:
Believing a negative is just as much a belief as believing a positive
Click to expand...
If you reject obvious physics and material science I will reference this again.

Interview with a survivor.

12.48 She got out, news reporter hugs this distressed woman.

13.14 FD/PD " The other one is going to go.'

13.20 News reporter. "Why are they pulling us out of here?"

13.26 FD/PD. " The North tower....The North tower is leaning"

13.30 North tower collapses.

This makes sense as the structure is failing, right?

 
psikeyhackr said:
The Twin Towers did hold themselves up for a couple of decades. The designers had to figure out how to distribute the steel to accomplish that.
Click to expand...
Is it possible, however unlikely you might think, that those designers did not design the building to be hit by large fast moving objects laden with high octane fuel?
 
(Q) said:
Is it possible, however unlikely you might think, that those designers did not design the building to be hit by large fast moving objects laden with high octane fuel?
Click to expand...
Actually they did, but those were not the larger jets of the 2000s.
The damage was more severe and yet, they stood strong for an hour plus, enough time to get everyone out.
Unfortunately, the location and intensity of the fires prevented that for 1000s of people.
 
Pinball1970 said:
Actually they did, but those were not the larger jets of the 2000s.
Click to expand...
They also assumed that they would be flying at less than 250 knots. (The "speed limit" if you will below 10,000 feet is 250 knots.) One plane hit at over twice that, meaning more than four times the kinetic energy. It's something of a miracle that either tower survived the initial impact.
 
psikeyhackr said:
I never said anything which contradicted that. I have been saying that the steel distribution data was necessary to analyze the problem all along.

This is just you projecting stupidity again, like bringing up Trump.

Believing a negative is just as much a belief as believing a positive.
Click to expand...
Can concrete support loads?
 
James R said:
Can concrete support loads?
Click to expand...

This answered your stupid question a while ago.

9/11

We are wasting time and I am getting bored. If you can't figure out that the trusses were not in the core and it was the core and perimeter columns that held up the building. Tough! You are not getting bored you are being humiliated by people who know a lot about physics, chemistry/materials...
www.sciforums.com www.sciforums.com
 
psikeyhackr said:
This answered your stupid question a while ago.

9/11

We are wasting time and I am getting bored. If you can't figure out that the trusses were not in the core and it was the core and perimeter columns that held up the building. Tough! You are not getting bored you are being humiliated by people who know a lot about physics, chemistry/materials...
www.sciforums.com www.sciforums.com
Click to expand...
No, we have given you multiple examples of where you claims are wrong. Material scientists, Engineers, Physics guys and actual clips.

I have lost patience with you. It is not our fault your don't get it or want to believe something else like a flat earther.
You are either just deluded stupid or a liar.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top