86 47

Wasn't it Eisenhower who issued the executive order creating ARPA in 1957, which started the creation of the Internet?

It's funny to watch the midgets when they argue about which side of the egg is the right one to break.
Yep. Also NASA. He realized that having one military organization dedicated to pure science - and one civilian organization dedicated to the space race - made a lot more sense than research within the bitter inter-service rivalries that had developed in the US military. And his vision bore fruit in many ways; the Internet was just one of them.

One of his final speeches on the subject:

Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been overshadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers.

And the cost of all that "blue sky" research was huge - billions of dollars. But where would we be today without it?
 
Yep. Also NASA. He realized that having one military organization dedicated to pure science - and one civilian organization dedicated to the space race - made a lot more sense than research within the bitter inter-service rivalries that had developed in the US military. And his vision bore fruit in many ways; the Internet was just one of them.

One of his final speeches on the subject:

Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been overshadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers.

And the cost of all that "blue sky" research was huge - billions of dollars. But where would we be today without it?
Так он же был республиканцем, а вы вроде бы за демократов? Не?
 
But he was a Republican, and you were supposedly for the Democrats? No?
Nope. I'm an independent.

Inherent in your post, though, is the idea that modern republicans are like republicans of the 1950's. They are nothing alike. Back in the 1950's, even being an adulterer would mean you could not be elected to any office; republicans back then were very moral. Today we have a republican president who is a felon and a rapist.

Indeed, a republican of the 1950's would be considered a democrat today. Even Reagan, who was much more recent than that, would be called an illegal-immigrant-loving socialist by today's republicans. He allowed millions of illegals to stay in the US! He signed gun control legislation, supported the Brady Bill and supported civil rights for gay Americans. He signed a bill that allowed more abortions to happen in California.

Personally my politics most align with republicans of the Lincoln era. Today that is closer to being a democrat than a republican, but since I often disagree with democratic positions on things like labor, military spending and the deficit, I am an independent.
 
Nope. I'm an independent.

Inherent in your post, though, is the idea that modern republicans are like republicans of the 1950's. They are nothing alike. Back in the 1950's, even being an adulterer would mean you could not be elected to any office; republicans back then were very moral. Today we have a republican president who is a felon and a rapist.

Indeed, a republican of the 1950's would be considered a democrat today. Even Reagan, who was much more recent than that, would be called an illegal-immigrant-loving socialist by today's republicans. He allowed millions of illegals to stay in the US! He signed gun control legislation, supported the Brady Bill and supported civil rights for gay Americans. He signed a bill that allowed more abortions to happen in California.

Personally my politics most align with republicans of the Lincoln era. Today that is closer to being a democrat than a republican, but since I often disagree with democratic positions on things like labor, military spending and the deficit, I am an independent.
Незавимые взгляды могут быть у меня, потому что я не живу в Штатах. А вы всё равно будете склоняться в ту или иную сторону.

А этот ваш президент, был осуждён за изнасилование? Или отбывал наказание за какие то другие преступления?
 
Even Reagan.. supported the Brady Bill
Even then, that took like nearly a decade to get passed. I can't imagine such a bill getting any substantive traction today (well, obviously today today, but even a few years back such a bill would be an impossibility).
 
And this president of yours, was he convicted of rape? Or was he serving a sentence for some other crime?
Nope. He was found liable for sexual assault, and the judge explained that this form of sexual assault (specifically forcible penetration against her will) was rape. Thus, when he said he didn't rape her - he was lying.

Re: the sentence for other crime - he was convicted of 34 felonies but has not been sentenced yet.
 
Nope. He was found liable for sexual assault, and the judge explained that this form of sexual assault (specifically forcible penetration against her will) was rape. Thus, when he said he didn't rape her - he was lying.

Re: the sentence for other crime - he was convicted of 34 felonies but has not been sentenced yet.
Я не понимаю - судья сказал, что было изнасилование, но он не был осуждён. Почему?

Т.е. решения суда по этим 34 преступлениям ещё не вынесено? Тогда почему вы называете его преступником? Возможно, его оправдают?
 
I don't understand - the judge said it was rape, but he wasn't convicted.
Because he has a lot of political power. Often in the US, if someone has a lot of political power, prosecutors will go for the crime they can convict the perp on, not the crime he really committed.

One of the most famous examples was Al Capone, a US gangster wanted for bootlegging, assault, and even murder. But no one would testify against him, or their families would be killed. What they COULD get him on was tax evasion, since they could prove how much money he had (by looking at what he spent) and it didn't match his reported income. So he went to jail for that, instead of murder.
So the court hasn't made a decision on these 34 crimes yet?
They have. He is guilty.
Then why do you call him a criminal?
Because he was found guilty of 34 felonies. He has used his political power to avoid being sentenced for his crimes.
 
Because he has a lot of political power. Often in the US, if someone has a lot of political power, prosecutors will go for the crime they can convict the perp on, not the crime he really committed.

One of the most famous examples was Al Capone, a US gangster wanted for bootlegging, assault, and even murder. But no one would testify against him, or their families would be killed. What they COULD get him on was tax evasion, since they could prove how much money he had (by looking at what he spent) and it didn't match his reported income. So he went to jail for that, instead of murder.

They have. He is guilty.

Because he was found guilty of 34 felonies. He has used his political power to avoid being sentenced for his crimes.
Разве в Штатах суды не независимы? И почему тогда демократы, будучи у власти, не дали ход этому делу?

Разве приговор не выносится сразу после признания виновности? Или ему присудили штраф? Какое наказание вынес ему суд?
 
Aren't the courts independent in the US?
Not any more.

And why didn't the Democrats, when they were in power, move this case forward?

They did. Once Trump was in office he quashed it.

Isn't the sentence given immediately after the guilty plea?

Nope. For felonies there is a separate sentencing phase.

What punishment did the court give him?

They gave him benefits, not punishments.
 
The Democrat Woke-Socialist corruption of America's judiciary, of laws and courts, didn't work in their favor and want to assassinate Trump, one way or another. The majority of the American electorate and people saw through it. And still do . . . more than ever now . . . and far more than that in the coming days, weeks, months, and years, providing the President survives the continuing Democrat Party Woke-Socialist (Fascist-Communist) radical calls for, and attempts at, assassination of one kind or another. It's more like Hitlerism and Maoism against Trump Americanism now than anything milder.
 
Not any more.



They did. Once Trump was in office he quashed it.



Nope. For felonies there is a separate sentencing phase.



They gave him benefits, not punishments.
Разве кто то может отменить вступившее в силу решение суда?

Почему суды у вас больше не независимые? От кого/чего они зависят?

Какие льготы у вас предусмотрены за уголовные преступления?
 
The Democrat Woke-Socialist corruption of America's judiciary, of laws and courts, didn't work in their favor and want to assassinate Trump, one way or another.
Then, why have both attempts on Trumps life been committed by people in the Maga party?
 
The majority of the American electorate and people saw through it.
Nope. Less than 50% of the people who voted voted for Trump. That's less than 45% of the electorate, and less than 25% of Americans.

Sorry about the facts! I know how much you guys hate them.

Democrat Party Woke-Socialist (Fascist-Communist) radical calls for, and attempts at, assassination of one kind or another.

The two people who have actually tried to kill him were republicans. (Or, in your language, veteran-hating, Constitution-shredding fascists.)

and still do . . . more than ever now . . .

Less than ever now. As the markets decline under his economy-killing tariffs, epidemics grow and prices skyrocket, fewer and fewer people support Trump. His approval rating started out at 51%. Now it's at 45% and dropping.

Again, sorry about the facts. I have a feeling they are going to trigger you bigly.
 
Because he has a lot of political power. Often in the US, if someone has a lot of political power, prosecutors will go for the crime they can convict the perp on, not the crime he really committed.
The reason they couldn't find him guilty of rape was because, under New York law, to rise from sexual assault to rape, it would have had to involve actual intercourse. Thus what he did didn't meet the legal definition of "rape" for this case. The judge's remarks were basically that while under New York law it wasn't "technically" rape, it would be considered rape by any other reasonable definition.
 
The Democrat Woke-Socialist corruption of America's judiciary, of laws and courts, didn't work in their favor and want to assassinate Trump, one way or another. The majority of the American electorate and people saw through it. And still do . . . more than ever now . . . and far more than that in the coming days, weeks, months, and years, providing the President survives the continuing Democrat Party Woke-Socialist (Fascist-Communist) radical calls for, and attempts at, assassination of one kind or another. It's more like Hitlerism and Maoism against Trump Americanism now than anything milder.
If nothing else, you're perfecting the art of fake outrage.
 
Back
Top