4th dimension is extension of 3rd dimension. A world within worlds
- Thread starter akabrutus
- Start date
Whether one sees space as real or otherwise, or whether one sees time is real or otherwise, or whether one sees spacetime is real or otherwise, it does nothing to invalidate Einstein's relativity, nor general cosmology today. It depends how one defines real.
What river of course is ignorantly pushing, is the decades old defunct Plasma/Electric universe, without seeing any need to match the experimental and observational evidence supporting SR/GR/BB, nor even explaining the gaps that do exist....that's why this is in the fringes.
Whether one sees space as real or otherwise, or whether one sees time is real or otherwise, or whether one sees spacetime is real or otherwise, it does nothing to invalidate Einstein's relativity, nor general cosmology today. It depends how one defines real.
What river of course is ignorantly pushing, is the decades old defunct Plasma/Electric universe, without seeing any need to match the experimental and observational evidence supporting SR/GR/BB, nor even explaining the gaps that do exist....that's why this is in the fringes.
Since River is in my ever expanding Iggy paddock no idea what he is on about
Fairly recently I have checked the new post. Lot of keto sign in with a alphabet name. How they slip through I have no idea
Place them in paddock in case try to chat direct
They slip through mostly because they use every available IP address in India.
exchemist
Valued Senior Member
By the way Michael, your identity has been hijacked by one of these spammers (not keto diet but academic cheating services), on another forum I belong to: https://www.religiousforums.com/thr...ing-true-evolutionists-”.230638/#post-6746362Since River is in my ever expanding Iggy paddock no idea what he is on about
Fairly recently I have checked the new post. Lot of keto sign in with a alphabet name. How they slip through I have no idea
Place them in paddock in case try to chat direct
As you can see, I've reported it and hope it will get banned.
Perishing nuisance, these people - or bots or whatever they are.
By the way Michael, your identity has been hijacked by one of these spammers (not keto diet but academic cheating services), on another forum I belong to: https://www.religiousforums.com/thr...ing-true-evolutionists-”.230638/#post-6746362
As you can see, I've reported it and hope it will get banned.
Perishing nuisance, these people - or bots or whatever they are.
Thank you for the information. Seems like I would need to join to report. But obviously need to make another ID
Not sure worth the bother
Will think about
Any suggestions from anyone welcome
******* Edit
I went back to the site and used the Contact Us and sent
**
I use Michael345 and you have a member Michael 345
This was reported to me by another member
I have no connection to this other person
Thank you I do not wish to join your forum
**
See what happens
Last edited:
exchemist
Valued Senior Member
Don't worry I've reported it to the mods there for you. Just thought you should know someone is using your "handle".Thank you for the information. Seems like I would need to join to report. But obviously need to make another ID
Not sure worth the bother
Will think about
Any suggestions from anyone welcome
******* Edit
I went back to the site and used the Contact Us and sent
**
I use Michael345 and you have a member Michael 345
This was reported to me by another member
I have no connection to this other person
Thank you I do not wish to join your forum
**
See what happens
Post # 101 , Einstein quote , first quote , disagree ,
Space then has a force .
For me space does not compress ; therefore is not a force . Space is a consequence of physical things , growing magneticfield . At this point there is no light energy .
To his last statement , agreed .
I disagree that it's a quote from Einstein, too. It's a quote from some guy called Lincoln Barrett.
Translation:
"I really havn't a clue about what is said, so I'll make up my own gobbledygook and pretend I know what I'm talking about".
end translation.
As I'm sure Michael understands, whether one sees space as real
otherwise, or whether one sees time is real or otherwise, or whether one sees spacetime is real or otherwise, it does nothing to invalidate Einstein's relativity, nor general cosmology today. It depends how one defines real.
The present cosmological model is not invalidated in any way shape or form, based on whether one sees space, time, and/or spacetime as real or otherwise....SR/GR/BB all remain firmly established.
Established , but incomplete .
There is nothing in the theory that includes the physics of absolute zero on objects ; the theory is based on high enery objects at very high temparatures ( Millions of degrees °Celceus ) , From the atom , to the periodic table . And smaller still.
Absolute Zero physics is also part of this Universe .
But not the physical .
Write4U
Valued Senior Member
Especially the physical. All physical interactions are mathematical in "essence".
1H + 2O + x = water, or ice, or mist, etc. The mathematics determine the ultimate "pattern"
Disagree
All physical interactions Naturally have mathematical connotations .
In real essence , the physical , the material world , creates the mathematics . Because without the physical objects , mathematics would not exist .
Write4U
Valued Senior Member
That is where we disagree.
The mathematics ar expressed through physical interaction. But the concept of Universal mathematical constants describes the very essence of a geometric spacetime.
How do you get geometry without anything physically existing ?