1/infinity = 0.infinity... should be something like that. The problem with losing the infinity is that you lose the total sum of parts. The total sum of parts is infinite. so.. 0.infinity... = 0.3,0.2,0.1,0.09 forever.
Last edited:
- Status
1/infinity = 0.infinity... should be something like that. The problem with losing the infinity is that you lose the total sum of parts. The total sum of parts is infinite. so.. 0.infinity... = 0.3,0.2,0.1,0.09 forever.
J
jeddysin
Guest
Yes, you all succeed to used a wrong theory in proving a wrong answer.
The OP or the attachment? The attachment was/is grabled and the OP is incoherent.
Actually, I proved the correct answer via math. It's real proof. Nothing you do or say can change that.
J
jeddysin
Guest
My OP is clear and conclusive. Maybe you need a Chinese teacher.
J
jeddysin
Guest
You are brainwashed and you get nothing but a error. I can deduce the exist of God, design a real AI-system.
OK.That is all.Go to find the "1", Meta-sample-space. Resolve all the probability paradox, for example, birthday paradox.For God, there is no paradox.
Last edited by a moderator:
You are welcome to show the error in my math.
I would love to see you "deduce" the existence of 'God'. So first question, which 'God'? Designing a real AI-system makes you about as special as any other person who can. Either way, it is utterly irrelevant.
How about you show me where my math is in error instead?
General challenge:
I have $5 that says the opening poster is probably a deluded crank and this thread will ultimately end up in the Cesspool. Any takers?
I have $5 that says the opening poster is probably a deluded crank and this thread will ultimately end up in the Cesspool. Any takers?
J
jeddysin
Guest
I've told you the current mathematic theory is totally a paradox, but you still use it to prove you are right. Can a wrong theory get a correct answer? To read some about 2012, go to understand China, something about it.
Learn to think like a normal man.
J
jeddysin
Guest
Go to play starcraft 1, design a real AI-system for it, let it play the game like a human being, using probability theory.
Chinese - no, I'm in Texas. I'd get more use out of learning Spanish.
And you might get more use out of learning some math.
You "telling me" something is a paradox doesn't actually make it a paradox. If you want me to accept what you are saying then you have to demonstrate it as true (which has not been done). For example, here is my demonstration that I am correct:
1 / 3 = .333...
1 = .333... x 3
1 = .999...
You are welcome to show where this is incorrect. If you cannot then the thought in your mind doesn't correspond to reality (i.e. it's false).
I am completely uncompelled to research something that has not been demonstrated to have any value. That's stupid of you to even suggest it.
What if I am a woman? What then? This is another stupid suggestion.
Why do you keep making these retarded requests?
- Status