Comparison Table
| Criterion | 2018 (Pikabu) | 2026 (Cont.ws) |
|---|---|---|
| Style | Technical, dense | Clear, structured |
| Form | Treatise | Manifesto |
| Examples | Classical paradoxes | Classical + new (AI, time) |
| Audience | Narrow circle of philosophers | Broad audience |
| Role of AI | None | Translation and formatting |
“Dear colleagues, if you consider the AI‑translation of my 2018 post to be an idea proposed by the AI itself for resolving paradoxes, then I will start to feel that I = AI — please do not make this identification!”
P.S. This was a joke, because you yourselves know how to use your own AI tools to verify and distinguish one work from another. Best wishes for the success of your forum.