When the degree of POSITIONAL DEPENDENCE (PD) of the dependent concept on the leading one within the same question is not taken into account — a paradox arises.
That is:
Hence: singularities, “edges of theory,” “impossible to explain the beginning,” “physics doesn’t work here.”This is not the mystery of the world — it is the consequence of ignoring PD.
Or even simpler:Paradox is a signal that the roles of leading and dependent have been confused.
(to be continued)
1. What are “leading” and “dependent” — in simple words
In any meaningful question there is always:- Leading — that on which everything else depends.
- Dependent — that which is possible only thanks to the leading.
- Intention → Text
- Rule → Move
- Foundation → Consequence
- Whole → Parts
2. What PD means (without the term)
PD means a simple thing:The dependent cannot be understood if it is considered as though it exists by itself.That is:
- Process ≠ Foundation
- Movement ≠ Meaning
- Result ≠ Goal
3. Where exactly the paradox arises
The paradox does not appear because of the complexity of the world, but because of a logical error in the formulation of the question.It is always the same: the dependent is considered as if it does not depend on the leading.Or even shorter: secondary is attributed primacy.4. Application to the Universe (key point)
In cosmological and philosophical questions usually:- Leading: foundation, goal, condition of possibility, position.
- Dependent: process, expansion, evolution, structure.
5. How this paradox looks in practice
We simultaneously assert:- Everything is explained by the process.
- The process gives completed meaning.
- The process explains how it goes,
- Completion answers why and to what end.
Hence: singularities, “edges of theory,” “impossible to explain the beginning,” “physics doesn’t work here.”This is not the mystery of the world — it is the consequence of ignoring PD.
6. How Position removes the paradox
Position is the leading. It is not process, not object, not event, but:- Makes difference possible,
- Makes process possible,
- Makes Goal possible.
- Process again becomes dependent,
- Completion ceases to be a “miracle,”
- Intensive result ceases to contradict the extensive.
7. Connection with the 12 Theses (briefly)
- Theses 1–6 show what the process cannot explain.
- Theses 7–9 introduce the necessity of the leading.
- Theses 10–12 name it Position.
- Your formula explains why paradoxes arise without this.
Final Formula
Paradoxes arise when we demand from the consequence what only the foundation can give.Or even simpler:Paradox is a signal that the roles of leading and dependent have been confused.
(to be continued)
