the real collusion investigation.

RainbowSingularity said:
you probably dont get out much
i have lost count of how many times i have been felt up in bars & clubs over the years.

self assertion of the difference between sexual predation and sexual collective socialization is an adult subject.
applying juvenile social understanding to it does it no service at all.

applying post assumptive self control to a sexual predator is just complete fantasy
regulating sexual predation behaviours amongst social culture is the key issue.
you seem to have glazed over that for some reason. WHY ?

inserting a sexualised act into a non-discript social setting only fuels the divide between consenting adults and sexualised bullying and sexual predation.

there are different social rules for different settings.
the comprehension of those is fairly advanced adult culture.

attempting to steal sexualised intimacy from another person against their consent is sexual predation
mischievous and part of a culture in consenting sexual theme social gatherings
completely inappropriate with the exact same people in a different social setting.
being incapable of comprehending those social culture differences invalidates the person from being able to discuss the fundermental dynamic motivators of such complex social and anti-social behaviours.
Click to expand...
She wasn't a predator she was a drunk. Asserting your own experience into mine is a simple mistake.
 
RainbowSingularity said:
gated communitys in the usa which created and modeled the system of forced compliance of house type, shape, colour, lawn care, trees, fences etc etc etc...
the list goes on.
flying any type of flag is a breach of that collective agreement that is performed in many countrys as part of their agreement to rent/buy the property in the first place.

labeling the person seeking to force the change as a victim after making the free will agreement to accept terms is dishonest.

today the isis flag, tomorrow the nazi flag
what difference is there when the agreement has already been made ?

is that liberty or attempted exploitation ?
business contracts have no gray area on such things unless directly written into them.

in Germany it is illegal to make the nazi salute
in the usa it is not
why is that ?
Click to expand...
Because Germans are not free and contracts "though legally binding" are the very thing used by powerful people in order to escape good conduct and conscious and allow evil to pervade in today's time.

The saying, "be careful who you get in bed with" comes from somewhere and is often used before signing contracts.

Pardon my lack of remorse at the disturbing grammar.
 
Beaconator said:
She wasn't a predator she was a drunk.
Click to expand...
re-valuing the nature of the terms of informed consent...(no... NO... No....nO.... saying no to everything doesnt change the nature of the subject being discussed & doesnt offer any further concept of definition, it is an emotional reaction to not being able to clarify something that your unable to emotionally come to terms with)

have you discussed predatory groping behaviours with groups of only women before ?

are you wanting to discuss developmental human behaviour or social culture regulation ?
the 2 are quite different

the women who rroped you was late 50s alcoholic and just divorced from her wife ? (you seem to wish to break everything down into black & white to prevent discussion of the nature rather than offer nature for the discussion, you may think your subtle in that but your not)

Beaconator said:
Because Germans are not free
Click to expand...
that is a philisophical political debate which you have not outlined instead your applying dog-whistle politics to it.
that doesn't advance the discussion it derails it.
 
RainbowSingularity said:
irrelevant
a jury must be of peers
not of innocents

this case has been tested.
bias is defined not by lack of innocence , but by pre-assumptive conclusion of moral directive.
Click to expand...
This is so wrong I don't know where to begin.

Bias is an inescapable fact of the very nature of linguistic conclusions. Prejudice is the type of bias you expressed in an elegant format I might add. A misunderstanding that I believe lies at the very heart between emotions and our ability to express them. Words use other words to define them in an endless cycle of jargon and "intent" of the word itself. But there is no substitution for feeling and far too many either incapable of empathy or with grievous misuse of their words.
 
RainbowSingularity said:
how many co-ed LGBTQ+inclusive adult only sexual themed social events have you been to(roughly) ?
Click to expand...
Um... None. But I find all "sex" parties gross. I would never go to a sex club just because of the compliance with baser instincts is just too predatory a suggestion. The need to please oneself through others is vile.
 
Beaconator said:
Um... None. But I find all "sex" parties gross. I would never go to a sex club just because of the compliance with baser instincts is just too predatory a suggestion. The need to please oneself through others is vile.
Click to expand...

autistic asexual ...
thats ok
you have 0 experience to discuss the complexities of predatory social behaviours when it comes to sex & social culture.

some people go through phases like that in their lifes for varying reasons.

there is a VAST difference between "sexually themed social events" and a "sex club"
inside the nature of "sex club" there is yet again an even vaster difference in types.

you are around 16 years old. pushed into an adults political world.

politics is about morality and culture and commerce.
though most have interactions of all 3
it does not mean that you have any legitimate wisdom or knowledge just because you define yourself as having to be self justified in having an opinion about a commerce financial transaction natured inside a political frame work.
 
Beaconator said:
I don't get my information from the internet. Makes it hard to cite.

He signed an executive order. AG Barr didn't get held in contempt and the full report was released to congress. That's the order of events laid out in the news I watch so I put two and two together. The order might have had nothing to do with the report.
Click to expand...

But you can't even tell us the name of the news, it seems.
 
Tiassa said:
But you can't even tell us the name of the news, it seems.
Click to expand...
I can. You just simply did not ask in a manner I would be able to understand. (=

You see I do have one simple vice. Yet that is not so much to win arguments or even express "truth above all else".

"We have art in not dying for the truth"-Nietzsche

This means not becoming angry at the sight of truth.

I withheld that I watch many news sources including One America News.

It makes me smile to withhold for good intent.

"Declassification is right around the corner"-Mark Meadows
 
How bizarre. Beaconators Message count does not increase. It's been stuck on 665 since page 1 of this thread alone.

Now that I'm checking, my count is also stuck.
 
Beaconator said:
I bet they all work for Morgan and Morgan.
Click to expand...
They don't.
Beaconator said:
CNN says some unnamed judge issued a subpoena for Trumps financial records.
Click to expand...
CNN named the judge.
The subpoena was for specific records relevant to the particular legal case - not "Trump's financial records".

Why do you post obvious and easily checked falsehoods?

Again - if you restrict your news to liars, such as whoever told you the Mueller report had been released to Congress without redactions, you will eventually lose track of reality.

You have.
 
Last edited:
iceaura said:
They don't.
Every assertion you have posted here is false.

Again - if you restrict your news to liars, such as whoever told you the Mueller report had been released to Congress without redactions, you will eventually lose track of reality. You have.
Click to expand...
It might not have been congress. Probably went to the corrupt "second chance report". Whoever is in charge of that.
 
iceaura said:
They don't.

CNN named the judge.
The subpoena was for specific records relevant to the particular legal case - not "Trump's financial records".

Why do you post obvious and easily checked falsehoods?

Again - if you restrict your news to liars, such as whoever told you the Mueller report had been released to Congress without redactions, you will eventually lose track of reality.

You have.
Click to expand...
Apparently it wasn't relevant to anything and will not pass go or collect 200$.

What's the case about?
 
Beaconator said:
Apparently it wasn't relevant to anything and will not pass go or collect 200$.
Click to expand...
How would you know? You don't even know the name of the judge, which CNN handed you.
That's the judge who determined its relevance.
Beaconator said:
Key testimony was overlooked that could have acquitted Popadopolis.
Click to expand...
No testimony was overlooked.
Beaconator said:
It might not have been congress. Probably went to the corrupt "second chance report". Whoever is in charge of that.
Click to expand...
When you have figured out what you are trying to talk about, don't forget to include it in your posts.
 
Write4U said:
How bizarre. Beaconators Message count does not increase. It's been stuck on 665 since page 1 of this thread alone.

Now that I'm checking, my count is also stuck.
Click to expand...
If you're looking at the post count under the name/pic of the poster, this will always show their total post count at the time you read the post, not when the post was made.
 
Baldeee said:
If you're looking at the post count under the name/pic of the poster, this will always show their total post count at the time you read the post, not when the post was made.
Click to expand...
But the number is not increasing at all.

edit; maybe there is a delay in the addition.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top