Asexperia's Wonderings

Asexperia said:
What do you perceive as time and force?
Click to expand...
How are day and night not perceptible? How are the changing seasons not perceptible? We couldn't count them if we couldn't perceive them.

How is lifting a rock not perceptible? You can feel the force in your back and in your hands. You can even compare the amount of force required to move different rocks.

What do you think perception means?
 
sideshowbob said:
How are day and night not perceptible? How are the changing seasons not perceptible? We couldn't count them if we couldn't perceive them.

How is lifting a rock not perceptible? You can feel the force in your back and in your hands. You can even compare the amount of force required to move different rocks.

What do you think perception means?
Click to expand...

Ok. Time as the periodical becoming is perceptible, but duration isn't.

We perceive the effort to lift the rock up, but not force.
 
sideshowbob said:
Sure it is. We can perceive the difference between one day and two days, can't we?

What do you think the difference is between effort and force?
Click to expand...

We just perceive the effects of duration, not duration itself.

With the effort we use force. We feel the effort, not force.
 
Asexperia said:
We just perceive the effects of duration, not duration itself.

With the effort we use force. We feel the effort, not force.
Click to expand...

What exactly do you hope to achieve with your 'theory' along with it's newly coined words?

How does 'Philochrony' improve people or the world around us?

To me it just appears that you make one desperate post after another attempting to explain 'Philochrony' - but you really don't explain why you have gone through such an effort. Even if everything you have posted is 'true' in what way exactly does it further science and/or enhance peoples lives?
 
IMO, cogn
sideshowbob said:
All we ever perceive of anything is the effects. What do you think perception means?
Click to expand...
Cognition from a particular perspective.
All the terms, functions, and results are fundamentally the same thing, but seen from a different perspective.

It seems to me that in many of the descriptions we are identifying the same thing, IOW we could place an equal (=) sign between most of the arguments.

Actually that is not necessarily bad, because viewing a thing or an event from different perspectives allows for greater understanding.

I have no objection to the introduction of new words to describe something. All the words we use in science did not exist at one time, they were all invented.

The trick is to come up with a word that most precisely defines the objective perspective.
 
Write4U said:
I have no objection to the introduction of new words to describe something.
Click to expand...
Neither do I - but it's usually people who understand the something who make up the new words. We don't need new words for "cow" made up by a guy who doesn't know what a cow is.
 
sideshowbob said:
Neither do I - but it's usually people who understand the something who make up the new words. We don't need new words for "cow" made up by a guy who doesn't know what a cow is.
Click to expand...
Indeed. Or, that there is already a perfectly good word for cow, called "cow".
 
1- It's Philosophy
2- A branch of Physics
3- I don't know
4- It's a pseudoscience
5- Other

For me the Philochrony is the branch of Physics that describes the
nature of time and helps us to visualize it.
 
Last edited:
5. Other: word salad.

And this is another flogging thread about a fanciful idea that's been brought up multiple times and dies a quiet death multiple times. It's in Free Thoughts because it doesn't belong anywhere else.
 
Given that this is basically a rehash of the thread, I have merged "What is Philochrony" with "What is Magnitive" - both are made up words.
 
DaveC426913 said:
5. Other: word salad.

And this is another flogging thread about a fanciful idea that's been brought up multiple times and dies a quiet death multiple times. It's in Free Thoughts because it doesn't belong anywhere else.
Click to expand...
Perhaps there should be a charge for Free Thoughts???

Refundable is something useful turns up? :)

Can't see many refunds being given

:)
 
Aristotle made up Logics.
George Boole made up Mathematical Logics.
Bill Gates made up Windows.
 
Yup. And first they made sure they knew what they were talking about.

To think outside the box, one must first educate oneself about where the box is.
 
And ...

Sigmund Freud made up Psychoanalysis.
Auguste Comte made up Sociology.
Norbert Weiner made up Cybernetics.
 
Asexperia said:
For me the Philochrony is the branch of Physics that describes the
nature of time and helps us to visualize it.
Click to expand...
Do the Scientists who work in the real world of physics know about your branch?

Are there any respected Physics publications carrying your research papers?

Have you a reserch centre or who are you affiliated with?

Do you only have your own publication outlet with vanity articles?

:)
 
Michael 345 said:
Do the Scientists who work in the real world of physics know about your branch?

Are there any respected Physics publications carrying your research papers?

Have you a reserch centre or who are you affiliated with?

Do you only have your own publication outlet with vanity articles?
Click to expand...

Too many questions for a young science.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top