Challenger78
Valued Senior Member
4 PAGES TO GO TILL THE BIG 7-00. KEEP DEBATING FOLKS.
and then. This shall be the longest thread ever.
and then. This shall be the longest thread ever.
how powerful exactly are these weapons? are there point of reference that can be used to measure them against SW and ST weapons? have they been used on unshielded "normal" targets like rocks and planetary objects?
i tried searching the net, but what the sites usually state is: plasma beams that penetrate most SG shielding with ease, which does not say much :shrug:
OH GOD... if the Borg assimilated the Replicators... god help us all!
I wonder if the borg and replicators would team up. I mean think about it, they are both very similar, in beliefs, maybe tech, and organization. I would not be surprised.
How does this prove that the Stargate folks would win? All this proves is that the Asgard beam weapon is impressive.
It it would be the replicators to beat the Borg.
the steps in power are explained above but surfice to say the human ships are equiped with the most mismatched weapons and shield systems but they are highly effective.
The replicators are made of nanites. Those bonds between them are powerful and the borg have nothing like it. And replicator nanites are smaller, virus size. Borg nanites are the size of a red blood cell....primitive technology. The replicators would invade the borg nanites and break them down for more of themselves.
Borg say bye bye.
And remember the Tauri ships are equipped with Asgard shields. They would lay waste to the Federation fleet. Daedalus and Appolo and now the General Hammond. Now that Atlantis is on Earth they'll have drone technology too.
The replicators are made of nanites. Those bonds between them are powerful and the borg have nothing like it. And replicator nanites are smaller, virus size. Borg nanites are the size of a red blood cell....primitive technology. The replicators would invade the borg nanites and break them down for more of themselves.
Borg say bye bye.
And remember the Tauri ships are equipped with Asgard shields. They would lay waste to the Federation fleet. Daedalus and Appolo and now the General Hammond. Now that Atlantis is on Earth they'll have drone technology too.
Excuse me? Borg nanites are smaller than blood cells. As seen in Scorpion when the Doctor used Borg nanites to defeat the infective capabilities of Species 8472 on human (Harry Kim's) blood cells. And the bonds between individual nanites have no bearing on which nanite tech is superior, it is simply necessary for the Replicator nanites to be bound tightly to manifest a coherent being - the spider like Replicator.
It is simply a fight of whose nanites would finish first. Assimilation or consumption.
I don't disagree that the Borg might lose mind you, just that it would be much more of a close fight than you allow. Let's not get like TW now!
All 3 ships? Against the raw power of a fleet of Federation vessels that you yourself have calculated to be immensely efficient at pumping out energy? No, no Boo-Boo, stand by your own arguments. Stargate Earth (by itself) has no chance against Starfleet Earth (and dare I say even a Warsie fleet). Two Go'auld capital ships almost destroyed one of them with conventional energy weapons. What could those little three ships, upgraded as they may be, do against the battery of say 50 Federation vessels? How about 100?
How about 300 Star Destroyers? (Even if they suck at aiming, chances are they will hit at some point!).
The Asgard fleet however would be a much much tougher opponent against either Wars or Trek. It is likely that they would inflict incalculable damage, however I'm still not sure they'd win outright. Against Captain Jean Luc Picard anyway.![]()
Excuse me? Borg nanites are smaller than blood cells.
As seen in Scorpion when the Doctor used Borg nanites to defeat the infective capabilities of Species 8472 on human (Harry Kim's) blood cells.
And the bonds between individual nanites have no bearing on which nanite tech is superior, it is simply necessary for the Replicator nanites to be bound tightly to manifest a coherent being - the spider like Replicator.
It is simply a fight of whose nanites would finish first. Assimilation or consumption.
I don't disagree that the Borg might lose mind you, just that it would be much more of a close fight than you allow. Let's not get like TW now!
All 3 ships? Against the raw power of a fleet of Federation vessels that you yourself have calculated to be immensely efficient at pumping out energy? No, no Boo-Boo, stand by your own arguments. Stargate Earth (by itself) has no chance against Starfleet Earth (and dare I say even a Warsie fleet). Two Go'auld capital ships almost destroyed one of them with conventional energy weapons. What could those little three ships, upgraded as they may be, do against the battery of say 50 Federation vessels? How about 100?
How about 300 Star Destroyers? (Even if they suck at aiming, chances are they will hit at some point!).
The Asgard fleet however would be a much much tougher opponent against either Wars or Trek. It is likely that they would inflict incalculable damage, however I'm still not sure they'd win outright. Against Captain Jean Luc Picard anyway.![]()
Now now Saquist, you know there's larger borge Nanoprobes and smaller borg Nanites. The NANITES are smaller than cells (hence how they can infiltrate the body without, you know, liquifying it). The nanoprobes are what you saw in that episode, and are larger than a red blood cell.
Also - I think some of the newer starships could find a way to overcome the Asgard beam - I'd bet Geordi would find a way, or Scotty. Or Data. Then again, the Enterprise-E post-nemesis vs the Daedelus would be an interesting fight... pretty much come down to who hit whom first
![]()
poor jester, since when are debates held on what is obviously biased ground?Is there really a point to this thread?
If you guys really want a guide to whether or not Star Trek or Star Wars would win if they ever faced off against each other, go to this site:
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Empire/
The basic verdict basically is: The Empire would roast the Star Trek universe.
And for all of your "BUT WHAT ABOUT THE BORG!!!!!!!!!1111" fanboys, here is a site that also deals with that: http://www.mrpoesmorgue.com/usvsd/borgs/nuborg.html
There! Debate is over!
Is there really a point to this thread?
If you guys really want a guide to whether or not Star Trek or Star Wars would win if they ever faced off against each other, go to this site:
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Empire/
The basic verdict basically is: The Empire would roast the Star Trek universe.
And for all of your "BUT WHAT ABOUT THE BORG!!!!!!!!!1111" fanboys, here is a site that also deals with that: http://www.mrpoesmorgue.com/usvsd/borgs/nuborg.html
There! Debate is over!
Saquist - that video they hit the Ori ship at least half a dozen times before the shields started to fluctuate... I don't think the weapon so much obliterated the shields as caused a massive feedback loop into the generators. I mean... the shields didn't fail UNTIL the ship started to explode o0'
to Saq:
dude, i really have to wach SG to be able to debate it, but from what i've seen on the clips and dead on this forums, i've reached following conclusions:
1. those beams are slow. very slow actually. SW TLs are at least fast enough to hit something big even though they are manualy fired (Lord Vasago, jamming does not explain the low SW acuracy. SW ships are teh slugs of SF. even a WWI fyring crew would aim better with nothing but rangefinders). from what i've seen in the clips the only time SG ships hit anything further away then <1km is when the target is absolutely still. they shoot eachother at closer ranges then even SW and ST.
2. if the planetar bombardement weapon of the Goauld (spelling) is at the 200MT range, this makes it on par with the heavier/st TNG planetary bombadement torpedo (Skin of Evil). if 1 torpedo has the power of their weapon, imagine a 10torps barage. and this is their top power. if normal torpedo loads are 25-50% the yield of that, ST Mirandas could cut through Goauld defences like through butter (asumming gouauld ships are designed to resist their own firepower). not to mention heavy platforms like Akira or Nebula. and that is just the trops.
now this conclusions are still worht little since we need a comparison of ofensive/defencive capabilities of the other ships. in example if an Ori ships has 100 times stronger shield then a Goauld it would take 100 times stronger weapon to penetrate it. in such a hipotethical example, a GCS that can obliterate 3 goauld ships with 1 forward torpedo salvo (10torps) would need a 30 such salvos (torpedoes only) to overpower the Ori. if each Ori can do the same level of distruction to the goauld then the GCS can last agains the Ori at least 60-70 beam strikes. this afcourse jsut an abstracion, since i know noth the ratio betwean the ori and goauld ships.
so is there a point of reference for such an analasys?