(alpha) Reinventing Sciforums -1- Choosing New Mods

How did he misuse his mod powers against Baron? He brought up a discussion in the moderator's forum and said what he wanted to do. He neither warned or banned Baron. He simply vented his frustration over the issue in a private forum. Sometimes, we do vent to our compatriots and they offer suggestions on how to handle the situation. We are after all human. And yes, sometimes we get angry and/or frustrated. He did not act on his frustration or his anger. What he did do was to bring forth his frustration to the moderator's forum for discussion. How is that an abuse of his moderation powers? Is he not allowed to have an opinion? Is he not allowed to state his frustration on a private forum and allow other moderators to help find a solution to his problem?

He was soundly vetoed by the other moderators and the administrators. And another solution was sought. Unfortunately, Avatar jumped before discussion could even get properly on the way on the matter to find another solution. Baron's position was always safe. I reiterate.. Baron was never in danger of moderator abuse of power. So how exactly did he abuse his power? What? Because he got angry and said that he should have just done it anyway? You do realise he wouldn't have, don't you? He could have turned around and banned Baron immediately then and there. But he did not. Do you know why? Tiassa is a stickler for the rules and always.. and I mean always.. discusses such issues before he acts (when it comes to bannings especially).. so that he can use others as sounding boards and try to find a solution that might be better than his own. That is what Avatar did not inform you all of.

So to say that Tiassa abused his moderator powers is in this case, absurd. And frankly it angers me when you are only presented with one side of the argument and you base your opinion on just that one side and completely disregard what the rest of us know and were privy to and tried to inform you of. We are unable to copy and paste what was said because we respect the privacy of that forum and we respect the fact that the owners expect us to not disclose private discussions to the general membership of this forum. So you can believe what you want to believe. But before you accuse Tiassa of abusing his mod powers, I would suggest you actually get both sides of the story first.

I am not angry at you Inzomnia. I am just tired of the finger pointing and the accusations that are completely unfair. Not only is Tiassa not able to defend himself (again, to do so would mean he would have to disclose what was said in a private forum), but none of us moderators or administrators of this site are able to speak out against the accusations that we are all somehow untrustworthy and liars.. because again, to prove our side, we'd have to disclose too much private information that is posted in the private forum.


Then I would suggest you make this wish known to the owner of this site when he returns. I have no problem with being replaced if the owners of this site think that someone else can do better. On the contrary, they should get the best person they can for the position and if that isn't me, then so be it.


I never accused Tiassa for misusing his power, in fact I am quite like Tiassa. What I said was from what I observe in the discussion of Baron Max banning. People accuse him of losing in debate with Baron Max or something and so he wanted to ban Baron. Even if actually Baron is wrong, if Tiassa is the one who will take action, people will still accuse him of misusing his power. And so I offered idea to let admin take over his power over Baron only. If this is sound like a bad idea, it's ok. It's just an idea..
 
I have discovered that all personal attacks against me devolve into power issues. ie why is she a mod. As if being a moderator of Biology should dictate your ethical, religious and political opinions.

As such, I see them as fear rather than anger or revenge. And no I don't report such attacks.


Well, in my personal opinion, IF it is a personal attack, it MUST be reported, unless you want to see her jumps on any given chance to hijack thread to attack you.
 
I don't think the moderators or admin are unaware of the situation. Personally I am not concerned with MW's rants and she is welcome to jump in on any discussion. :)

If I objected to every single person who insulted me on this site because of my political or religious or ethical opinions, the list would be very very long.
 
I don't think the moderators or admin are unaware of the situation. Personally I am not concerned with MW's rants and she is welcome to jump in on any discussion. :)

If I objected to every single person who insulted me on this site because of my political or religious or ethical opinions, the list would be very very long.

In another word, you would have the problem continuously coming? And let it assassinate your character? (I hate this word, but I mean to refer to character assassination).
 
Does people making unsupported statements lead to character assassination? Thats not how I judge other people. And if by chance someone were to believe I was unbiased or unfair simply on someone's say so, it would hold very little significance for me. Have you read Surah an-Naas? Waswasa will follow you everywhere in life.
 
From wiki:

Character assassination is an intentional attempt to influence the portrayal or reputation of a particular person, whether living or a historical personage, in such a way as to cause others to develop an extremely negative, unethical or unappealing perception of him or her.


Compare that to this:

*************
M*W: That's because S.A.M. is not a sincere person, and she is an unfair mod. She doesn't discuss or debate, she just trolls. Most of her 40 gazillion posts are nothing but a wrench thrown into the topic. S.A.M. is highly biased against many members, the West, and against atheists, plus there's probably a lot of biases S.A.M. has that I haven't addressed here. S.A.M. abuses her power as mod. I'm sure the admin is aware of this, but somehow they are powerless to deal with S.A.M. (or so it would seem). I would hope that the admin has our best interests at heart, but as long as S.A.M. is allowed to be a mod, it's apparent that they don't.
 
So does it work? Are there people here who believe MW? Why do you think moderators did not delete her posts?
 
So does it work? Are there people here who believe MW?

In my opinion, if what M*W (or any other attackers) said is not true, then it is a personal attack. If it is a personal attack and you did nothing about it, it means you support the breaching of forum rules.
 
I am not moderator of the forums where she posted that. Is it your opinion that I should report each and every post that is aimed at insulting me?
 
I am not moderator of the forums where she posted that. Is it your opinion that I should report each and every post that is aimed at insulting me?


Eventhough I gain no personal benefit in typing this, I think so, that you SHOULD report EACH and EVERY post that aimed at insulting you personally. Here is your choice: are you actually bad (as what is depicted in the insult), or weak (for not doing anything)?
 
In another word, you would have the problem continuously coming? And let it assassinate your character? (I hate this word, but I mean to refer to character assassination).

How can you assassinate a made up character?

Do you go around telling people that you are Amethyst08?
 
Mostly I think my problem is I don't take such stuff seriously, frequently it makes me laugh. I guess I am just precocious?
 
Mostly I think my problem is I don't take such stuff seriously, frequently it makes me laugh. I guess I am just precocious?

No, but you waste everybody's time. Sorry, I am leaving this thread. I have to pick up my laundry and iron some clothes. Ciao..
 
No, but you waste everybody's time. Sorry, I am leaving this thread. I have to pick up my laundry and iron some clothes. Ciao..

But there is nothing to stop you making the reports if you feel it will achieve something, is there?:p

Ciao!
 
Why not try new mods on a trial basis? Seems easiest. Plazma gets a sense of how they're doing, keeps or doesn't keep them.
 
Back
Top