Why banning anyway?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Would all members prefer it if moderators did not discuss and ask for options but just banned people they had continuous problems with? Is it wrong to discuss options with other moderators and then decide the best course?

I think we would prefer mods to ask each other for opinions on certain posts, and no pre-empt the punishment due by talking about a ban.

IE 'What do you think about this? <linkl>'

reply "That's worth a warning' kind of stuff, and take the consensus.
 
if things here are really that bad as far as the community perceptions of mods and moderation, why not appoint an ombudsman? a conduit b/w community and moderators

hmm
"identified as lacking real content" (stryder)?

lemme transgress....

perhaps i should go on a quest to seek out reason and rationale with the focus on mod prattling in sci. then pronounce as unfit?

hmmmm
what resources would be required?

sam - 1/2 a brain cell
james - a single brain cell
bells - 2 brain cells
tiassa - 5 of said cells

my bots can deal with the rest

/snicker

understand this, maggots
i am fabulously enlightened
ya'll aint

/om
 
I think we would prefer mods to ask each other for opinions on certain posts, and no pre-empt the punishment due by talking about a ban.

IE 'What do you think about this? <linkl>'

reply "That's worth a warning' kind of stuff, and take the consensus.

Do you assume the moderator in question just started a thread that said "I'm going to ban Baron soon cos he pisses me off"?:bugeye:
 
I think we would prefer mods to ask each other for opinions on certain posts, and no pre-empt the punishment due by talking about a ban.

IE 'What do you think about this? <linkl>'

reply "That's worth a warning' kind of stuff, and take the consensus.

We already do that.

But when there is repetitive and consistently poor behaviour, a mod is within their rights to say, looke here I have this this and this problem with this member.

Here is an example of xyz behaviour <insert link> which was due to this <insert link> and has been repeated here <insert link> and here <insert link> and here <insert link> and here <insert link>.

Previously I have had these issues <insert link><insert link><insert link><insert link><insert link><insert link><insert link><insert link>

The person was previously banned for <insert link> behaviour and this one <insert link> and this one <insert link>.

This looks like a recidivist repeat offender. I suggest a permanent ban, what do you guys think about it?
 
Don't know, but I have had reports I have made blabbed to the forum. Reports I might add that I did not even send to that particular MOD. It seems as though if one gets a report they share everything with eachother. Then if one has it in for you, they use that information to their own advantage.




shorty darlin'
thou!
thouest art
thick as a brick
 
......Here is an example of....

cool
here is a counterexample

Eeny,<insert link> <insert link> meeny,<insert link> miny,<insert link> <insert link> <insert link> moe
Catch <insert link> <insert link> a <insert link> tiger<insert link> by<insert link> the <insert link> <insert link> toe
If he<insert link> <insert link> <insert link> hollers let<insert link> <insert link> <insert link> him <insert link> go,
Eeny,<insert link> <insert link> meeny,<insert link> miny,<insert link> <insert link> moe.


does it hang?
does it hang, baby??

/excited

This looks like a recidivist repeat offender. I suggest a permanent ban, what do you guys think about it?

response 1 :

well i never!
please dont ban baron max

response 2 :

sound the alarm!
garcon!
we have here a breach of protocol
demote immediately
 
Last edited:
Ah Gussy, I am trying to say that its not a single instance that warrants such discussions, its multiple episodes of [flame-warn-ban][sup]n[/sup] that lead to them
 
Well you'll be happy to know that a majority of time, thats all we do. Discuss it. Its the only way we'd know that there were problems
 
For once I would agree with Gustav :eek:


uuhh
noob
the quote is missing the the last part. the all important qualifier

thus i have no choice but to conclude that you hold the role of moderation to be a waste of time in general

hmm
i cannot agree
i wonder why
oh!
must this trifling matter of you being somewhat retarded and shit

pardon
how does it feel?

/intrigued
 
Ah Gussy, I am trying to say that its not a single instance that warrants such discussions, its multiple episodes of [flame-warn-ban][sup]n[/sup] that lead to them

And the people who could be the peace-makers (e.g. moderators) often actually provoke more anger. You've seen it, everyone's seen it, and it's not limited to me. Actually, if it were limited to me that would be really weird and still wrong.
 
And the people who could be the peace-makers (e.g. moderators) often actually provoke more anger. You've seen it, everyone's seen it, and it's not limited to me. Actually, if it were limited to me that would be really weird and still wrong.

I think that stems from instances where they try to restrict some form of behaviour and get a fuck off in return.
 
thus i have no choice but to conclude that you hold the role of moderation to be a waste of time in general

As a moderator of physics and *beeeep* oh... my bad... you know that is kinda exhausting. :(



Nah, I'm just kidding, I am not an undercover mod, lmao :D
 
And the people who could be the peace-makers (e.g. moderators) often actually provoke more anger.


thats the thing these noobs dont have
perspective
how things were and how they are now
and how sci is a work in progress

most criticisms emanating from the community nowadays is fabulously retarded and irrelevant

i know that when i see the mods dispatching arguments with such ease

/backhanded compliment

You've seen it, everyone's seen it, and it's not limited to me. Actually, if it were limited to me that would be really weird and still wrong.


fallacious crap
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top