I see no reason to assure any occupiers of their safety, thats like saying the Allies should have reassured Hitler when he was in France. Complete nonsense. What we need is for right thinking people to recognise, as they did for France, that occupation by an Aryan Jewish group who believes in a Jewish State with right of return for Jews only while murdering natives who are not Jewish and are essentially defenceless, is oppressive and undemocratic and take action accordingly. One does not negotiate with oppressors, one is not concerned with how safe Mugabe feels while he is killing people just as one is not concerned with people who consider such actions as defensive: http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/909589.html http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2003/jul/28/israel This is not defense, this is genocide. And while you may feel the need to "reassure" such people of their safety, I don't.
Perhaps because Americans believe it is their religious duty to support the murder of children in Palestine. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
One cannot comprehend the American insistence on supporting a state based on ethnocracy other than to some kind of fanatical compulsion.
************* M*W: America's recent outreach to Palestine does little to bring back the children who have died. I've never met a Palestinian that I didn't like. I don't discriminate against Jews. I've worked with Jews and Muslims all my life, but in all honesty, the Jews I've known have been cheap, disgusting scavengers who have no interest in human life. Muslims, OTOH, have respect for human life (from my medical perspective). I wish I could say they both did, but in my professional experience, I cannot.
Your statement reminded me of this article by Judt on how Israel has become a focus by which non-Israeli Jews are judged:
So then you believe that all wars are fought by religious fanatics and for religious purposes. You know that Muslims believe in Armageddon also?
Why? 60% of funds raised for the Democratic party, and 35% of funds raised for the Republican party, are donated by the Jewish establishment in America. These numbers are staggering, considering Jews make up a petty portion of the American population (roughly one percent). With funding like this, members of the two aforementioned parties have practically no choice but to support the Israeli cause. They're owned. The Jews also have an extremely strong lobby in America as well, in addition to the largest foreign spy ring in the U.S. Most importantly, disproportionate Jewish control over mass media outlets have enabled them to consistently fool Americans into supporting Israel. "We shall drive the Christians into war by exploiting their national vanity and stupidity. They will then massacre each other, thus giving room for our own people." (Rabbi Reichorn, in Le Contemporain, July 1st, 1880)
It's in James Petras's book, The Power of Israel in the US. Petras expands on JJ Goldberg's statistics for the same issue in the 1990s. http://www.populistamerica.com/the_power_of_israel_in_the_us
the creation of Israel and its continued existence and the American revalution and the states continued existence are nothing alike.
AIPAC has a powerful influence: http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/JF03Ak01.html The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy, written by Stephen Walt from Harvard University and John Mearsheimer from the University of Chicago, published in 2007
That's just another way of saying Jews are politically active. And Jews are Americans, so Americans support Israel.
Especially when they are Jewish. So do American Jews support Israel over the United States? There are AIPAC members who spy on the US for Israel, any of them spying on Israel for the US?