gas is too cheap.
year with all got it bad petrol is expensive in england and the rest of the u.k, but why don't we convert to the electric car
If not drilling at home, then the USA needs to REALLY start invading countries-- personally I'd take Canada and Venezuela over Iraq any day.
~String
sry exxon?
Killing people beats driving less any day.
Where are these ENORMOUS reserves in the States???Americans have to accept the fact that if we aren't going to begin taking advantage of our own ENORMOUS oil supplies (as yet untapped because of whiney tree huggers)
Where are these ENORMOUS reserves in the States???
Links?
Gas is about $7 per gallon here. We get it cheap because Norway is an oil exporting nation.
Killing people beats driving less any day.
"Here are some key facts about conventional oil in Canada.
Canada is the eighth-largest producer of crude oil in the world.
Canada produces over 2.5 million barrels of crude oil per day. We currently export over 1.6 million barrels per day of crude oil, primarily to refineries in the central and western United States.
We have huge, undeveloped crude oil deposits."
"Total Canadian production is projected to increase from the current 2.5 million barrels per day to reach 4.9 million barrels per day (b/d) by 2020."
Thanks, by the way Sandy, did you see my offer on PM?
I wonder when the US will start killing people in Canada for their oil?
I doubt they will; they would hate having to take personal responsibility for the victims, which would be so much harder to avoid when they live next door.
Nah, much more likely they'll float the idea of a North American Union.
Nope its not; its the single most important reason the US will not start a war with any neighbors close enough to jump fences.Don't be ridiculous, that's a complete non-issue.
On what grounds?
The blueprint President Bush is following was laid out in a 2005 report entitled "Building a North American Community" published by the left-of-center Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). The CFR report connects the dots between the Bush administration's actual policy on illegal immigration and the drive to create the North American Union:
At their meeting in Waco, Texas, at the end of March 2005, U.S. President George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin committed their governments to a path of cooperation and joint action. We welcome this important development and offer this report to add urgency and specific recommendations to strengthen their efforts.
What is the plan? Simple, erase the borders. The plan is contained in a "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" little noticed when President Bush and President Fox created it in March 2005:
In March 2005, the leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States adopted a Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), establishing ministerial-level working groups to address key security and economic issues facing North America and setting a short deadline for reporting progress back to their governments. President Bush described the significance of the SPP as putting forward a common commitment "to markets and democracy, freedom and trade, and mutual prosperity and security." The policy framework articulated by the three leaders is a significant commitment that will benefit from broad discussion and advice. The Task Force is pleased to provide specific advice on how the partnership can be pursued and realized.
To that end, the Task Force proposes the creation by 2010 of a North American community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity. We propose a community based on the principle affirmed in the March 2005 Joint Statement of the three leaders that "our security and prosperity are mutually dependent and complementary." Its boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within which the movement of people, products, and capital will be legal, orderly and safe. Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America.
...
As stated in prior post US is losing economically to Asian nations becuse too many potentially good brains are not developed in the poor rat infested school. Except for chance picking up of that piece of obsidian, Ben would probably be using his good brain to deal drugs. The childish brain, that noticed some pretty, wood-destroying fungus, which if it had been well educated, might have already solved the problems of making alcohol from any celulose is also probably dealing drugs. America can not longer afford the loss of more than half of its most important resource for the information age.
They get free lunch and baby sitting monitors in buildings called schools. Typically few or no books in the library, if there is one. The rat catching, drug dealing, training they receive does come in useful when released into the outside world.So dont they get free education in US if their parents cant afford it ?