What happned to Saddam-Iraq's WMD that they have used on Kurds & on Iran?

Bin Laden and Saddam were both Sunnis, they both hated America, so I'd be shocked if they hadn't worked together, plus, weren't Al Qaida operatives meeting with Saddam's officials?

Meetings do not constitute a working relationship. Saddam and the US had many meetings. Bush 41 was with a Bin Laden during the 9/11 attacks.
 
It's not supposedly.

On 11 September, while Al-Qaeda's planes slammed into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, the Carlyle Group hosted a conference at a Washington hotel [the Ritz-Carlton Hotel-SG]. Among the guests of honour was a valued investor: Shafig bin Laden, brother to Osama.
 
Last edited:
Buffalo Roam,

I'm still curious, while Clinton admited to giving misleading testimony, and I agree to this, I wanted to know if he LIED.

Well, did President Clinton LIE when he said he didn't have sex with Monica?

Michael
 
Yes he did, not by the term congress had put forward, but he did know th BJ and using a Cigar as a Dildo does constitute as sexual relations.
 
Michael, it called using a euphemism, to soften the his actions, just as he parched the definition of sexual relations, and he cut a deal so there was no conviction which would have changed the whole debate on Impeachment.
 
You got a great point, the US can't even get a hold of the border to stop illegal entries, which shows you how difficult it is to "scan" large areas.
I thought the US "knew" where they were, "They're in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat."
 
Last edited:
Nickelodeon, there is a vast difference in knowing that something exist and knowing were it is at, Black Holes, we know that they exist, but we can't really locate them.
 
Post site proof.
MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: And is it curious to you that given how much control U.S. and coalition forces now have in the country, they haven't found any weapons of mass destruction?

SEC. RUMSFELD: Not at all. If you think -- let me take that, both pieces -- the area in the south and the west and the north that coalition forces control is substantial. It happens not to be the area where weapons of mass destruction were dispersed. We know where they are. They're in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat.

http://www.usembassy.it/file2003_03/alia/A3032803.htm

Unless of course he was just bullshitting.
 
Normal political double speak for I don't know were they are, the area that he describes encompasses the manufacturing facilities, but you don't store the weapons at the manufacturing site, so were they were stored could be any where in Iraq, and I wonder if we know were all of the storage sites were, as Saddam seemed to store stuff everwere, schools, hospitals, public buildings, regular ammo storage facilities, and hidden sites that have not been discovered, hell we are still finding stuff that Hitler weaseled away from WWII. There are site from the cold war that are just now turning up, one I heard about was in Switzerland.

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: Finally, weapons of mass destruction. Key goal of the military campaign is finding those weapons of mass destruction. None have been found yet. There was a raid on the Answar Al-Islam Camp up in the north last night. A lot of people expected to find ricin there. None was found. How big of a problem is that? And is it curious to you that given how much control U.S. and coalition forces now have in the country, they haven't found any weapons of mass destruction?

SEC. RUMSFELD: Not at all. If you think -- let me take that, both pieces -- the area in the south and the west and the north that coalition forces control is substantial. It happens not to be the area where weapons of mass destruction were dispersed.
We know where they are. They're in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top