Why? I think at this point, pjdude was kind of pointing out the obvious in how sideshowbob has decided to debate and the content of what he he has said thus far in this thread. We should ask ourselves if stating the obvious is disgusting, or if questioning if "real harm" happens when the child is sexually molested and raped or when the child is made aware of what their doctor did to them. Keep in mind, Dr. Bradley molested dozens of children, ranging from a few months old to pre-teens. Some, he drugged and then raped them so violently they had to be revived, others he digitally raped them while they were a few months old. And he got away with it for years.