Xinjiang anti-Han violence

Yes agreed, except:
1. Bin Laden was not the MAIN reason.
2. The USA wants a pipeline via Kazakhstan.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

OK, lets suppose the USA wants a pipeline via Kazakhastan (that's reasonable) - does this pipeline run through Xianjiang? And how did the USA waving it's magical wand and causing anti-Han Chinese violence in Xinjiang China achieve this pipeline?

Also, instead of pulling out the magic wand, waving it around, causing Han-Chinese to attack Muslim Chinese in Guangdong then spreading this around in Xiangjiang and then causing riots and then causing Muslim students in Kazakhstan to hold riots, all of which supposedly are going to somehow magically get an oil pipeline running through somewhere over to the USA - why not just bribe and or do a deal with politicians in Kazakhstan to build a pipeline? Also, is this pipeline going to run right on over to the USA or is it somehow going to run to a port city? Also, is the USA going to pay market price for Kazakhstan oil or is it going to just get it all for free?

See the difference b/w reality and CT???

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Kazakhstan is pro SCO thus anti Nato. Destabilization is the method used by the US to create "colour" revolutions to install pro US regimes.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Read the article I posted in #25.

Of course.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

and what's wrong with that? Yeah, the USA would like pro-USA governments to work with. Big surprise there.

Revolution of any color require a majority of people to partake in them. If not then it doesn't matter now does it? IF a majority of people protest, then things should change.

Pretty fracken simple.

You make it sound like there's some sort of conspiracy. It's not. It's called normal.

 

Of course, the US regime change history in South America attests to this.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

No, its called US foreign policy.

No, its called US foreign policy.

 

StrawDog, if you want to think Muslims rioting in China, in Xinjiang, in response to a rumor in Guangdong after 50 years of Han migration to the point where Muslims are now the minority, is all the work of The Omnipotent and All Powerful USA - go for it.

 

The belly dancers will be good .
China is a tyrant regime with no human rights and with an iron fits policies . Although Chinese keep on eating dogs, cats, rats, mice....etc, the Chinese communist party boosts of its high standard of living . China with about one and half billions to feed is becoming an extreme danger for the peace in the world .

 

Also the U.S. and its allies need permanent military bases in Afghanistan and in the region .
I said " PERMANENT ".