Would an inverse-cube law obey Newton's shell theorem?

Discussion in 'Physics & Math' started by eram, Mar 15, 2013.

  1. RJBeery Natural Philosopher Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,136
    Good one, Tach!
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. RJBeery Natural Philosopher Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,136
    Let me be more specific: when you allow yourself to be wrong and are capable of admitting that you are wrong that's when learning happens. It's possible that Tach still believes he's never lost an argument (as daft as that premise is)
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Tach Banned Banned

    Messages:
    5,265
    No, I simply pointed out that it makes no sense for you to keep bringing up the debate since you amply demonstrated that you had no clue on the subject regarding the Doppler effect and that you still don't since you are still under the severe delusion that you won that debate, otherwise you would not keep referring to your utter debacle, that's all.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. RJBeery Natural Philosopher Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,136
    The damn searching function seems to be flaky, but dig up the thread (the original public debate AND the subsequent thread started by me on matte wheels) and we can discuss if you sincerely continue to believe that you were right on that subject. (?!!???!)
     
  8. Tach Banned Banned

    Messages:
    5,265
    The only purpose would be to further expose your inability to comprehend a fairly simple subject. You lost that debate once, this is enough.
     
  9. RJBeery Natural Philosopher Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,136
    You have a fascinating ego defense mechanism, Tach.
     
  10. eram Sciengineer Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,875
    Clash of The Egos.
     

Share This Page