World trade centre collapse, 9/11 conspiracy

Discussion in 'Conspiracies' started by someguy1, Nov 4, 2017.

  1. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    25,266
    Physics my friend is far from what you talk about and so far has been invalidated by many over around 23 pages...and that's just here, a remote forum open to all to spew their nonsensical conspiracies when the world has ignored them for their ignorance and stupidity.
    But the airliner and fire did produce the known effects, and of course if you had sufficient intestinal fortitude, you would do as others suggested and build your own scale model to verify your own conspiracy nonsense.
    Obviously you don't like being labeled a conspiracy pusher? Facts are if you lay down with dogs, You'll wake up with fleas.
    The only holes are in your head and the nonsense you spew.
    Because I don't hold to unsupported, fanatical conspiracy nonsense similar to the tripe you are trying to push.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. psikeyhackr Live Long and Suffer Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,136
    I am so impressed!

    You can throw around the word "conspiracy" but can ignore the idiotic error by Frank Greening of dividing the mass of one of the towers by 110 even though 6 of the heaviest levels were underground.

    Pages? The 10,000 of the NCSTAR1 Report cannot even specify the amount of concrete in the towers. LOL
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,089
    From The Physics Factbook, readily available on Google:

    "A single tower consists of 90,000,000 kg (100,000 tons) of steel, 160,000 cubic meters (212,500 cubic yards) of concrete and 21,800 windows. One single tower has a mass of about 450,000,000 kilograms (500,000 tons)."

    Also lists five other sources for weight of the towers.

    https://hypertextbook.com/facts/2004/EricChen.shtml

    "No one knows the amount of concrete in the towers" LOL!
     
    paddoboy likes this.
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. psikeyhackr Live Long and Suffer Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,136
    I didn't say no one knows, I said the 10,000 page NCSTAR1 report didn't have it. That makes sense to you? What kind of authority would not have that information?

    But what sense does the total make without the distribution? How much steel was on level 1? How much on level 100? Great scientific analysis after almost NINETEEN YEARS. It was only 12 years from Sputnik to Tranquility Base. American engineers should be very proud.
     
  8. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,089
    Ha! You said you put me on ignore, but apparently you are as honest about that as with anything else.

    Yes, it makes sense to me that a 10,000 page report didn't have every bit of reference material that they used copied into it. If they had done that, it would have been 100,000 pages.
    They did have the information, of course.
    Yep. We are waiting for you to produce it. How hard can it be? Why are you withholding this information, unless you know that it will disprove your ridiculous claims?
     

Share This Page