working model of the universe, dimensions, gravity, and energy

Discussion in 'Alternative Theories' started by trevor borocz johnson, Dec 22, 2015.

  1. Oystein Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    890
    This shows how much you DON'T know about science and the scientific method. You don't have a "theory". You have wild, unsupported speculation.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,162
    You need to read up on CDT (caysal dynamical triangulation) by Renate Loll.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causal_dynamical_triangulation
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. trevor borocz johnson Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    248
    I did a little what about it are you trying to bring up?
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,162
    Just trying to stay on topic.
    Apparently you did not read the last part of that quote.
     
  8. trevor borocz johnson Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    248
    "This means that it does not assume any pre-existing arena (dimensional space), but rather attempts to show how the spacetimefabric itself evolves."

    is this the last part of the quote you're referring to? help me out here.
     
  9. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,162
    Yes, and I can't help you other than to say that fractals are abundantly observable in nature. For the physics, read Professor Renate Loll and her colleagues. This is cutting edge stuff, because it addresses the mathematical *dynamical causality* of spacetime itself and is not in conflict with either QM or GR.
     

Share This Page