working model of the universe, dimensions, gravity, and energy

Discussion in 'Alternative Theories' started by trevor borocz johnson, Dec 22, 2015.

  1. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,461
    As Dywyddyr pointed out some days ago, try saying "Borocz" in a Japanese accent.

    He and I both think that is the key to understanding our friend here.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. trevor borocz johnson Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    248
    speed of the universe and universal lifetime is just luck like a red dwarf's planetary system where the star burns for 100 billion years vs our sun to be a 10 billion year star.
     
    Spellbound likes this.
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. quantum_wave Contemplating the "as yet" unknown Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,625
    I want to acknowledge your post over on my thread, and say that I took another look here. Something in me wants to say keep it up, you're making me look good, lol, but then it is hard to grasp and visualize other dimensions, universe walls, a block of void creating space in the outside dimensional universe, etc. It doesn't resonate with my views at all, but let me peak in later and see how it is going.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. trevor borocz johnson Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    248
    One has to remember that a teaspoon full of quarks is the weight of the earth. When you talk about a quark you're not talking about feathers or sand. As a material it has a lot of weight. Incredibly dense for its size it filters space through it and as Einstein's and my theory holds the gravity field is like a ball on a large piece of cloth.
     
  8. origin In a democracy you deserve the leaders you elect. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,578
    You're a hoot.
     
  9. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,167
    Whatever the fundamental configuration is, it is not cubic.

    The fewest components to construct a 2D *plane* is the *triangle*. From the triangle we can build 3D decahedrons and it is suspected that the universal construct is a dodecahedron.
     
    Thantilaxath likes this.
  10. trevor borocz johnson Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    248
    uh huh and what if the pieces were to get stuck facing the wrong direction. Then you create a Rod Serling place between dimensions known as the Twilight Zone.
     
  11. trevor borocz johnson Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    248
    you can never wait for infinity to be over, but you can divide any moment of time infinitely.
     
  12. Beer w/Straw Transcendental Ignorance! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,267
    Uh... I'm having a hard time making sense of this thread.
     
  13. trevor borocz johnson Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    248
    I know I think I might make a computer model to try to explain it better post it on youtube.
     
  14. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,167
    They cannot face the wrong direction, the *fabric* (field) of the universe unfolds through the fractal function. See CDT (causal dynamical trinagulation) Renate Loll.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causal_dynamical_triangulation
     
  15. trevor borocz johnson Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    248
    "Using a structure called a simplex, it divides spacetime into tiny triangular sections. A simplex is the multidimensional analogue of a triangle; a 3-simplex is usually called a tetrahedron, while the 4-simplex, which is the basic building block in this theory, is also known as the pentachoron. Each simplex is geometrically flat, but simplices can be "glued" together in a variety of ways to create curved spacetimes,..."
    I think hidden in Einstein's coined term 'spacetime' is the meaning that two substances exist in the vacancy of void, the substance of space and the substance of energy. The honeycomb universe theory uses the substance matter and energy, termed void and energy, matter void and space being the same substance just as time and energy are, to describe the effects of many observed phenomena like gravity, magnetism, water pressure, thermal heating in nuclear decomposition etc.. So my question is where is the time in the causal dynamical triangulation theory of spacetime? Also where it says "Each simplex is geometrically flat, but simplices can be "glued" together in a variety of ways to create curved spacetimes,..." is this suggesting that a mass with a gravity field would change the geometrical pattern of spacetime? If so how would it change back?
     
  16. trevor borocz johnson Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    248
    since the speed of light, time and energy, depends on the density of space in the dimension you're in, I suppose time could be a constant across all dimensions infinitely but that counters the idea of the speed of matter which has to take time to settle into nature when it passes through a universe/quark, but how could those two things both be true? Time as it relates to the density of space, meaning that in the outside universe to our own the space is unimaginably less dense and big. Theoretically you could look out your window and observe any sun or moon in the sky from this dimension ( that is if were not in some nebula) just not directly but it s there. Anyways the speed of light in this dimension would be an unimaginable multiple of the our own speed of light. Could this mean that life in both dimensions moves at the same speed?
     
    Last edited: Jan 23, 2016
  17. trevor borocz johnson Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    248
    I know I'm not the first to say that because I've seen a popular video that expresses the same notion.
     
  18. Daecon Kiwi fruit Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,133
    Does this "popular video" have a name?
     
  19. trevor borocz johnson Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    248
  20. AlexG Like nailing Jello to a tree Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,304
    The Simpsons? You'r e a bigger fool than I thought.
     
  21. Beer w/Straw Transcendental Ignorance! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,267
    There's more than that video clip aren't there...
     
  22. trevor borocz johnson Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    248
    actually one might do that, skipping the hard part of a parallax view with the earth taking pictures from opposite sides of the sun, by just adjusting the zoom on the telescope reguralry and seeing if one direction reaches the edge of the visible zone first. That's a shortcut something math teachers hate me for cause I hate all that in between work.
     
  23. trevor borocz johnson Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    248

Share This Page