Will NIST ever fix their tables?

Einstein's nine (9) primary fundamental universal base unit values
1) Einstein luminous intensity: [(hG/c^5)^1/2]/sr = 9.8601020(30) x 10^-46 cd
2) Einstein time: (hG/c^5)^1/2 = 1.3511889(33) x 10^-43 s
3) Einstein length: (hG/c^3)^1/2 = 4.0507625(15) x 10^-35 m
4) Einstein amount of substance: [(hc/G)^1/2]/M = 1.6605388(62) x 10^-27 kmol
5) Einstein mass: (hc/G)^1/2 = 5.4563031(18) x 10^-8 kg
6) Einstein electric current: e/[(hG/c^5)^1/2] = 1.1857531(48) x 10^24 A
7) Einstein temperature: [(hc^5/G)^1/2]/k = 3.5518626(92) x 10^32 K
8) Einstein relative permeability: (e0hc)/e^2 = 6.8517999(55) x 10^1 rad
9) Einstein inverse fine-structure: (2e0hc)/e^2 = 1.3703599(91) x 10^2 sr

Planck's non-primary fundamental non-universal base unit values
1) Planck luminous intensity: [(bar-hG/c^5)^1/2]/sr = 3.9336115(89) x 10^-46 cd
2) Planck time: (bar-hG/c^5)^1/2 = 5.3904639(43) x 10^-44 s
3) Planck length: (bar-hG/c^3)^1/2 = 1.6160204(35) x 10^-35 m
4) Planck amount of substance: [(bar-hc/G)^1/2]/M = 6.6245916(02) x 10^-28 kmol
5) Planck mass: (bar-hc/G)^1/2 = 2.1767500(08) x 10^-8 kg
6) Planck electric current: e/[(bar-hG/c^5)^1/2] = 2.9722423(67) x 10^24 A
7) Planck temperature: [(bar-hc^5/G)^1/2]/k = 1.4169882(01) x 10^32 K

Legend's http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/
Planck constant: h = 6.6260693(11) x 10^-34 kg-m^2/s
Newtonian constant: G = 6.6723635(22) x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2
speed of light in vacuum: c = 2.99792458 x 10^8 m/s
molar Einstein mass: M = 3.2858629(47) x 10^19 kg/kmol
elementary charge: e = 1.6021765(31) x 10^-19 A-s
Boltzmann constant: k = 1.3806504(11) x 10^-23 kg-m^2/s^2-K
electric constant: e0 = 8.854187817... x 10^-12 A^2-s^4-rad/kg-m^3
Dirac constant: bar-h = 1.0545716(84) x 10^-34 kg-m^2/s

Will NIST ever fix their tables?

Garry Denke

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Ah. He's posted this here now.
Finally. Maybe someone will answer.

Is there anything wrong with the tables, James?
He's posted this at at least two forums that I've perused in the past month. The one you know about was short of physics guys to answer and the other didn't even want to entertain Denke's foolishness. But, in searching his posting history at the forum, I think I've discovered what he's trying to insinuate.

It has to do with gravitons.

What it has to do with gravitons, I don't know.
But he's posted these lists of constants over and over again and the older threads in which they take place always lead to gravitons.

Back story: Denke believes that the Ark of the Covenant is buried beneath the heelstone of stone henge and when it is dug up a graviton surge will be released (among other things) which will bring about the apocalypse. I'm sure I don't have the full story of his... 'theory' but I bet I understand it better than most seeing as he always posts in his 'riddle' style. I was quite surprised by how open he was about the stuff in his past posting style at the other science forums (not the one you know about.)

Anyway. Is there anything wrong with the list of constants or is he just begging for attention?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Dirac's constant, more commonly written hbar, what has come to be known as Dirac's error.
The conclusion was this: h/2(pi) is not the radiant quantum; h/rad is the radiant quantum.

Dirac's constant = h/rad
Dirac's constant = Planck constant/Einstein relative permeability
Dirac's constant = [6.6260693(11) x 10^-34 kg-m^2/s]/[6.8517999(55) x 10^1 rad]
Dirac's constant = 9.6705527(81) x 10^-36 kg-m^2/s-rad
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Dirac's constant

1) Planck luminous intensity: [(hbar*G/c^5)^1/2]/sr = 1.1911846(04) x 10^-46 cd/rad
2) Planck time: (hbar*G/c^5)^1/2 = 1.6323517(24) x 10^-44 s/rad
3) Planck length: (hbar*G/c^3)^1/2 = 4.8936673(56) x 10^-36 m/rad
4) Planck amount of substance: [(hbar*c/G)^1/2]/M = 2.0060728(79) x 10^-28 kmol/rad
5) Planck mass: (hbar*c/G)^1/2 = 6.5916805(41) x 10^-9 kg/rad
6) Planck electric current: e/[(hbar*G/c^5)^1/2] = 9.8151428(25) x 10^24 A/rad
7) Planck temperature: [(hbar*c^5/G)^1/2]/k = 4.2909537(24) x 10^31 K/rad

See top post for values of h and rad.
Welcome back James R,
Garry Denke

 

Wow. That was amazingly clear and succinct.

Are you feeling ok, Garry?

James? Anything to it?

 

Planck's constant is not in error, it was Dirac's constant that was in error.

Correcting equation: Dirac's constant (barh) is equal to the elementary charge constant
(e) squared divided by the electric constant (e0) times the speed of light in vacuum (c):

barh = e^2/e0c

elementary charge: e = 1.60217653 x 10^-19 A-s
electric constant: e0 = 8.85418781 x 10^-12 A^2-s^4/kg-m^3
speed of light in vacuum: c = 2.99792458 x 10^8 m/s

barh = 9.67055275 x 10^-36 kg-m^2/s

Dirac's error was the NIST h/(2 pi) definition exactly.
Legend's http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/

Want to help fix angular momentum's angles?

Garry Denke

 

hbar = h*(2*alpha) = 9.67055275 x 10^-36 J-s

Adjust Planck natural unit values through a new definition of hbar so the dielectric constant (ke) and relative permeability (km) result in 1 (unity). The speed of light in vacuum (c) and Newtonian constant of gravitation (G) and elementary charge (e) are measured quantities and unchangeable, so the only way to attain ke (dielectric constant) and km (relative permeability) unity (1) is through a new definition of hbar. Here are the necessary Planck natural unit values for such unification:

mass: (hbar*c/G)^1/2 = 6.59168053 x 10^-9 kg
length: (hbar*G/c^3)^1/2 = 4.89366735 x 10^-36 m
time: (hbar*G/c^5)^1/2 = 1.63235172 x 10^-44 s
current: e/[(hbar*G/c^5)^1/2] = 9.81514283 x 10^24 A

e/e0 = ke
electric permittivity: e = 8.85418781... x 10^-12 F/m
electric constant: e0 = 8.85418781... x 10^-12 F/m
dielectric constant: ke = 1 (unity)

u/u0 = km
magnetic permeability: u = 1.256637061... x 10^-6 N/A^2
magnetic constant: u0 = 1.256637061... x 10^-6 N/A^2
relative permeability: km = 1 (unity)

Because hbar is a theoretical value (not a measured quantity) it is the only option for the attainment of these values. Replacing the old Dirac hbar definition "h/(2*pi) = 1.05457168 x 10^-34 J-s" with the new Denke hbar definition "h*(2*alpha) = 9.67055275 x 10^-36 J-s" in the Rydberg constant equation, Bohr radius equation and Hartree energy equation (from the Schrodinger original equation using Planck constant "h") results in 13.6056922 eV for 1/2 Hartree energy (ionization of hydrogen):

Bohr magneton: uB = e*h/(4*pi)*me = 9.27400949 x 10^-24 J/T
nuclear magneton: uN = e*h/(4*pi)*mp = 5.05078343 x 10^-27 J/T
Rydberg constant: Ryd = (alpha^3)*me*c/hbar = 1.09737315 x 10^7 /m
Bohr radius: a0 = hbar/(4*pi)*(alpha^2)*me*c = 5.29177210 x 10^-11 m
Hartree energy: Eh = (alpha^2)*(e^2)*me*c/e0*hbar = 4.35974417 x 10^-18 J

1/2 Hartree energy (ionization of hydrogen):

RYDBERG CONSTANT

Ryd = (alpha^3) * me * c / hbar
Ryd = [(7.29735256 x 10^-3)^3] * (9.10938260 x 10^-31 kg) * (2.99792458 x 10^8 m/s) / (9.67055275 x 10^-36 J-s)
Ryd = 1.09737315 x 10^7 /m

http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?ryd|search_for=Rydberg constant

BOHR RADIUS

a0 = hbar / (4*pi) * (alpha^2) * me * c
a0 = (9.67055275 x 10^-36 J-s) / (1.25663706... x 10^1) * (7.29735256 x 10^-3)^2] * (9.10938260 x 10^-31 kg) * (2.99792458 x 10^8 m/s)
a0 = 5.29177210 x 10^-11 m

http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?bohrrada0|search_for=Bohr radius

HARTREE ENERGY

Eh = (alpha^2) * (e^2) * me * c / e0 * hbar
Eh = [(7.29735256 x 10^-3)^2] * [(1.60217653 x 10^-19 C)^2] * (9.10938260 x 10^-31 kg) * (2.99792458 x 10^8 m/s) / (8.85418781... x 10^-12 F/m) * (9.67055275 x 10^-36 J-s)
Eh = 4.35974417 x 10^-18 J

http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?hr|search_for=Hartree energy

Hartree energy in eV (2x ionization of hydrogen)
Eh = 27.2113845 eV

http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?threv|search_for=Hartree energy

1/2 Hartree energy in eV (ionization of hydrogen)
Eh/2 = 13.6056922 eV

Old definition for hbar in cgs units:

hbar = (e^2) / alpha * c
hbar = [(4.80320440 x 10^-10 esu)^2] / (7.29735256 x 10^-3) * (2.99792458 x 10^10 cm/s)
hbar = 1.05457168 x 10^-27 erg-s

New definition for hbar in cgs units:

hbar = (e^2) * (4*pi) / c
hbar = [(4.80320440 x 10^-10 esu)^2] * (1.25663706... x 10^1) / (2.99792458 x 10^10 cm/s)
hbar = 9.67055275 x 10^-29 erg-s

Old definition for hbar in SI units:

hbar = (e^2) / (4*pi) * e0 * alpha * c
hbar = [(1.60217653 x 10^-19 C)^2] / (1.25663706... x 10^1) * (8.85418781... x 10^-12 F/m) * (7.29735256 x 10^-3) * (2.99792458 x 10^8 m/s)
hbar = 1.05457168 x 10^-34 J-s

New definition for hbar in SI units:

hbar = (e^2) * (4*pi) / (4*pi) * e0 * c
hbar = [(1.60217653 x 10^-19 C)^2] * (1.25663706... x 10^1) / (1.25663706... x 10^1) * (8.85418781... x 10^-12 F/m) * (2.99792458 x 10^8 m/s)
hbar = 9.67055275 x 10^-36 J-s

Because (4*pi) / (4*pi) cancels out in the above expression the
new definition for hbar in SI units as reduced is hbar=e^2/e0*c

Garry Denke
http://www.garrydenke.com
http://www.denocoinc.com