Will anyone check on this?

Discussion in 'Science & Society' started by Bishadi, Sep 17, 2009.

  1. Bishadi Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,745
    http://www.subtleenergies.com/ORMUS/tw/what.htm


    "Does this mean that NASA astronauts have been millions of light years away on their way to the moon or does it mean that David Hudson can be wrong about things?"

    i am inquiring on the phenomenon of the cells experiencing 'stress'

    is the 'per se' evidence available? (on that phenomenon itself being observed)
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,523
    It means that David Hudson is a crank and can't be bothered to get his terminology (let alone his science) correct.
    See also this.
    "Millions of light years"? I'm surprised (well not really) that you even bothered asking.

    Still, he's not the only one.
     
    Last edited: Sep 17, 2009
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Enmos Staff Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    Oh, the humanity! :bugeye:
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. tuberculatious Banned Banned

    Messages:
    987
    if one of the shuttles blow up, does that mean the tissue somewhere else dies as well in a fireball?
     
  8. Bishadi Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,745
    rock hudson lived the life of a fasod but lots of good movies came from him

    same with Orson Welles

    is there something on this claim of cells reflecting this stress? (looking for the evidence, not just the claim)

    If it is available i am thinking somewhere in NASA's library and was wondering if anyone else heard of such......
     
  9. spidergoat Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    51,740
  10. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,523
    So you quote yourself with a non-sequitur?
    WTF do actors have to do with it?

    The guy is a CRANK.

    Don't ask - I did and I'm still waiting for an explanation after a month or more...
    Bishadi talks his own particular brand of English and science: nothing to do with reality.
     
  11. John Connellan Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,636
    Haven't read the article but from the looks of the excerpt given above - sounds like somebody is abusing quantum entanglement again?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  12. Bishadi Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,745

    funny how the majority on the forum don't even know the science behind that (but you put it together and Hudson doesn't even address it)

    but the reality is, i saw the quote while doing a little reading on monatomic ions, after reading a question on 'water'

    it was an accident and why i made the inquiry before doing any homework into finding the data.

    Notice the thread title and OP..............

    but good to see some people can read the analogy and put the pieces together (causality of what could cause that PHENOMENA)

    nice to see once in awhile that people (practically anyone) can comprehend such basics, even without the community

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  13. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,523
    There's science behind it?

    You mean after reading that nonsense about "how homoeopathy works"?

    FFS it's not an analogy (will you learn English!), and there is only a claimed phenomenon, with no evidence.

    Hudson is a crank.
     

Share This Page