It occurred to me that the sciforums moderators of low intelligence as opposed to the one very intelligent mod, take objection to my use of the term "Reality" any further because it defies conformity. They would prefer to allow the ignorant, vile and mediocre thoughts of their fellow atheistic dunces reign supreme. Hence, sciforums continues to maintain the illusion of a mutual respect between originality and conformity. For instance, JamesR and Bells would prefer to listen to the likes of Daecon and Sarkus whenever dealing out infraction points or banning me for writing on CTMU. But tell me, how else am I to reach a logically sound argument on God without bringing up this topic? Am I supposed to learn advanced logic from scratch while abandoning the CTMU? Obviously, willing me to make less visible my threads on this topic is a dick move. Who are you deem what is best? Speaking of which, JamesR will only continue to do what he does best, label and censor unique and superior thought due to its failing to fall neatly inside the realm of his simple understanding. And Bells will continue to do what she does best, be the opposite of original. They would rather flex their muscle as authority figures and obtain a shallow victory than to allow the best of the best to express themselves. Since when did sciforums become an institution?