Why no brass age?

Discussion in 'Human Science' started by Saint, May 25, 2021.

  1. arfa brane call me arf Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,647
    I'll have to correct my first post in the interests of historical accuracy.

    It turns out that tin and lead were the first metals that were smelted from ore; copper ore needs about 200° more than a wood fire can attain. It seems that copper smelting had to wait until pottery kilns were invented. So that suggests that we already had the idea that metals can be extracted from 'special rocks', rather than a lucky find.

    Why it took as long as it did for alloys to appear is opaque, it seems. They already had tin when copper was first smelted. Now there was a growing metallurgic science, mining was important during the Chalcolithic.

    But, there's evidence of early bronze alloys, perhaps they were too difficult to work at first, or, working bronze had to wait for more technology to be invented; necessity and all that . . .
     
    Last edited: Jan 13, 2022
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. arfa brane call me arf Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,647
    Once brass arrived, it was eventually used to make things like the Antikythera device, and later the astrolabe; brass was probably the first metal used in this way and its availability obviously enabled those developments.

    It's believed the Antikythera mechanism was made about 200 BC, around the time Archimedes was alive.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.

Share This Page