Why does the government hide UFO's?

Discussion in 'UFOs, Ghosts and Monsters' started by darksidZz, Apr 19, 2016.

  1. sideshowbob Sorry, wrong number. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,202
    There must be a name for that fallacy: Read the same books that I do and you'll agree with me.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Magical Realist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,974
    Or, educate yourself on a topic by reading up on it so you can credibly talk about that topic.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. sideshowbob Sorry, wrong number. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,202
    That's a different fallacy: People who disagree with me are uneducated.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. darksidZz Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,923
    My reading suggests that

    1. Aliens are telepathic
    2. They have achieved interstellar travel
    3. Their ships use 100% of the energy, nothing is lost
    4. They have spread out to our planet rather than traveling to it purposefully (initially)
    5. David Jacobs may be unreliable as the Emma Woods fiasco shows
    6. Insectoids are the true aliens with the greys being some kind of hybrid attempts

    Concerns are I've deduced only telepathic species can achieve interstellar travel because of the resources and knowledge pool required, it would need a cohesive society with no deviations from one part of the planet to another. They would need to work together for such an achievement. So naturally it makes sense these visitors are telepathic.

    Also a plan of colonization would only make sense if you were bioforming your species, that would leave the environment intact and all the resources instead of terraforming which would destroy or alter them. Infact terraforming as we think of it may be impossible on a planetary scale. The idea they are attempting this is supportive they are real as it makes sense and falls in line with a reason.

    Just a few thoughts
     
    Magical Realist likes this.
  8. Kittamaru Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. Adieu, Sciforums. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,938
    I know you will simply ignore it... as you are want to do... but for the sake of "doing my job", I am obligated to remind you:

    http://www.sciforums.com/threads/sciforums-site-rules.142880/

    Knowingly posting false or misleading information
    15. The intentional posting of false or misleading information is unacceptable. This includes posting half-truths, i.e. leaving out relevant and known information to give a false impression

    Trolling
    18. Trolling is the posting of inflammatory posts with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional (often angry) response. Trolls aim to disrupt normal on-topic discussion, often by raising tangential or irrelevant hot-button issues. Trolling posts are intended to incite controversy or conflict and/or to cause annoyance or offence.

    Trolls are damaging to online communities because they attempt to pass as legitimate participants in discussions while actually seeking to disrupt normal conversation and debate. If permitted to remain, trolls tend to reduce the level of trust among members in an online community. One consequence may be that truly naive posts are rejected by sensitised members as just more examples of trolling.

    Trolls tend to follow certain patterns of behaviour that may include:
    • Posting of similar responses and topics repeatedly.
    • Avoiding giving answers to direct questions put to them.
    • Never attempting to justify their position.
    • Demanding evidence from others while offering none in return.
    • Vanishing when their bluff is called, only to reappear in a different thread arguing the same point.
    • Deliberately derailing discussions onto tangential matters in order to try to control the flow of discussion.
    Trolls are not tolerated on sciforums.
     
    river and Kristoffer like this.
  9. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    14,887
    With all due respect:
    is only true if the listed rules are enforced.
     
    Daecon likes this.
  10. river

    Messages:
    15,403
    Last edited: Oct 23, 2016
  11. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    14,887
    Wow! I stand corrected!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  12. river

    Messages:
    15,403
    Careful dave , you overstep your bounds .

    Just saying
     
  13. Kittamaru Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. Adieu, Sciforums. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,938
    Believe me... the rules are slowly starting to be actually enforced after an odd period of being quite loose in several sub-forums for reasons I do not (and cannot) agree with.
     
  14. river

    Messages:
    15,403
  15. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    14,887
  16. river

    Messages:
    15,403
    To read about a subject throughly you need to read a book .

    This is an object found .
     
  17. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,965
    Bzzt.
    Actually it's evidence of lower intelligence.
    Namely: those who believe it's 250,000 years old.
    http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Wedge_of_Aiud
    "The wedge is simply a tooth from a modern day excavator bucket, the kind used by workers digging foundations for construction projects. The results of metallurgical tests made on the wedge are consistent with modern 2000 series duralumin..."
     
  18. river

    Messages:
    15,403
    http://hilblairious.blogspot.ca/2014/12/aluminum-aliens-and-gear-they-left.html
     
  19. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,965
    So you agree that it's not 250,000 years old?
    Then why bother referring to it at all?
     
  20. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    14,887
    Heh! The moment I saw it, the first thing I thought was "that looks like a tooth from an excavator". But I thought that was to silly to say out loud.
     
  21. river

    Messages:
    15,403
    When you read the article in my post # 715 , it's so clear cut , as to be a tooth from an excavator .
     
  22. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    14,887
    YOU claim to have read them.
    And YOU make the claim that we are ignorant of all these wonderful things.
     
  23. river

    Messages:
    15,403
    . Interestingly though, manufacturers note that the most common applications for the 2000 series Aluminum alloys are aerospace, military vehicles and rocket fins.
     

Share This Page