Why does the government hide UFO's?

Discussion in 'UFOs, Ghosts and Monsters' started by darksidZz, Apr 19, 2016.

  1. river

    Messages:
    15,403
    And pad the same , challenge me " enthusiastically .

    Books
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Daecon Kiwi fruit Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,133
    What's extraordinary about a book? Anyone can write a book.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. river

    Messages:
    15,403
    The depth of the information is far more in a book .
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    26,773
    The truth of the matter is that there is just as much rubbish, quackery and crankdom written in books, as there is on the www: It's just that the www is far more accessible.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  8. river

    Messages:
    15,403
    More accessible for those who could careless about the truth .
     
  9. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    26,773

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Could or couldn't river?
    You, again seem to have missed the point: That being there is as much shit in print, as there is on the www.
    Daniken, Burlitz and Lerner were three I mentioned to you the other day.
     
  10. river

    Messages:
    15,403
    How would you know pad ?
     
  11. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    26,773
    I've read all three books, to give myself a more balanced view on the nonsense that you and MR so fanatically support.
    Then I looked at the science, and the scientific method. Unlike you, I did not automatically grab hold of some crutch. simply because it was "outside the box"
    See river what you fail to recognise, is that while thinking out side the box is admirable and encouraged, 90% of it fails at the first hurdle.
    Daniken, Burlitz and Lerner fell at that.
     
  12. river

    Messages:
    15,403
    Three books pad ?

    Thats all ?
     
  13. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    26,773
    Enough to give me a reasonable outlook on the nonsense they propose.
    Let's ask you a question now river, although both Dave and I have asked previously and you have yet to answer>>>anyway

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    Tell me what reputable physics/cosmology book have you ever read river?
    Or let's rephrase that: What book by a reputable author have you ever read river.
    Did you read a "Brief History of Time" river? by Stephen Hawking river.
    [I picked that one because it covers a wide ranging cosmological picture and discusses the well know theories like SR and GR that 21st century comsology is built on in simplistic terms.]
     
  14. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    26,773
    I'm challenging the extraordinary nonsense you propose, without any extraordinary evidence to back it up, and you have been continually asked for.
     
  15. river

    Messages:
    15,403
    Three books pad .

    Shameful are so ignorant on the topic .
     
  16. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    26,773
    You havn't answered the questions river?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  17. river

    Messages:
    15,403
    Yes I have , but you refuse to READ anything but what you have already .
     
  18. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    26,773
    Have you? Hmmmm.
    I have asked essentially the same questions as Dave.
    Well let our peers be the judge.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  19. river

    Messages:
    15,403
    Peers such as whom ?
     
  20. Daecon Kiwi fruit Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,133
    You're not even trying to answer my question, are you?

    You claim that the "extraordinay evidence" is in a book, yet you won't specifiy exactly WHAT that evidence is. I don't think there is any extraordinary evidence after all, and that you're just lying.

    So come on, river, what exactly is this extraordinary evidence that you're talking about?
     
  21. river

    Messages:
    15,403
    Read books , you will find it there .
     
  22. Daecon Kiwi fruit Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,133
    No, I'm asking YOU, directly, what evidence?

    Have you read "a book"? Then why don't you tell us about what you read, in which book?
     
  23. Kittamaru Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. Adieu, Sciforums. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,938
    River - you are making claims of "extraordinary" measure; such claims require "extraordinary" supporting evidence. You have been asked, several times, quite directly and succinctly, to provide this evidence... continued refusal to do so does not help your case one iota. Kindly answer the question or, if you cannot, state as such.
     

Share This Page