I think this documentary will change their minds: http://documentaryvideos.org/who-killed-john-oneil/:(
England is not a Monarchy, the Monarchy is Titular, no power, no authority, England is a Parliamentary Democracy.
Now you just prove that. It isn't that they don't want a Queen, it is that they don't want to be ruled by a Queen, so they rescinded the governing authority of the Monarchy.
No difference who calls himself what. The monarchy was replaced by colonialists and they were replaced by structural adjustment policymakers and global arms dealers.
Do I need proof? It is quite obvious that many average Americans don't care, and proof enough is the fact that only around 35% of the people vote during the elections. In fact, the average American can't even pin his State on the map, let alone foreign nations. Yes, but the Queen let them do so?
Published on Central Asia-Caucasus Institute Analyst (http://www.cacianalyst.org) INDIA\'S MOUNTING MILITARY PRESENCE IN CENTRAL ASIA By Stephen Blank (02/10/2003 issue of the CACI Analyst) New Delhi hopes to supplant China as a major regional arms supplier. It can also take advantage of underlying concerns within Southeast Asia regarding China, touting Indian weapons systems as free from the risks of being swallowed by an aggressive China in the future. India Halts Arms Sales to Burma to Try to Press Junta ... India has halted all arms sales and transfers to Burma, a development that could ... Burma, also known as Myanmar, is regarded as one of the world's most ... http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/29/AR2007122901345.html? Bhutan Armed Forces - Flags, Maps, Economy, History, Climate ... Most if not all of the army's weapons in the 1980s were manufactured in India. ... No claims are made regarding the accuracy of Bhutan Armed Forces ... http://www.photius.com/countries/bhutan/national_security/bhutan_national_security_armed_forces Army officers selling weapons on Rajasthan borders- Hindustan Times Army officers have been selling their weapons illegally in the grey market, with the help ... Others North India Stories · Sukhi case exposes police tactics ... http://www.hindustantimes.com/Redir.aspx?ID=2cede572-6be0-48da-bab4-a5c68bbba599 Russia first in selling arms to third world - Europe ... The leading buyer in the developing world in 2005 was India, with $5.4 billion in weapons ... Vietnam plans to allow expatriates to buy and sell houses ... http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/10/29/news/weapons.php
Ahahahhahahaha! :roflmao: UN Passes Arms Trade Treaty Over US Opposition The United States, the world's largest supplier of small arms, was the only country that opposed the resolution. http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/1027-01.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_2004United States presidential election, 2004 United States presidential election, 2004 At least 12 million more votes were cast than in the 2000 election. Based upon 2000 census figures, 42.45% of the U.S. population voted in the 2004 election. Note that this is a percentage of the entire population, not of just eligible voters. The record turnout—the highest since 1968—was attributed partly to the intensity of the division between the candidates and partly to intensive voter registration and get-out-the-vote efforts by both major parties and their allies. [3] http://www.statemaster.com/graph/gov_200_tot_vot_as_per-2004-election-total-votes-percentage Showing latest available data. Rank States Amount (top to bottom) #1 Minnesota: 76.7% #2 Wisconsin: 73% #3 Maine: 72% #4 North Dakota: 70.8% #5 Oregon: 70.6% #6 Montana: 69.9% #7 New Hampshire: 68.9% #8 Iowa: 68.8% #9 South Dakota: 67.1% #10 Wyoming: 66.3% #11 Missouri: 66.3% #12 Vermont 13 Alaska: 65% #14 Ohio: 64.8% #15 Michigan: 64.7% #16 Massachusetts: 63.7% #17 Kentucky: 63.4% #18 Louisiana: 63.1% 19 Delaware: 62.8% #20 Utah: 62.8% #21 Pennsylvania: 62.5% #22 South Carolina: 62% #23 Washington: 62% #24 District of Columbia: #25 Alabama: 61.8% #26 Colorado: 61.7% #27 Nebraska: 61.3% #28 Illinois: 61% #29 New Mexico: 60.9% #30 Mississippi: 60.7% #31 Kansas: 59.7% #32 Maryland: 59.7% #33 Oklahoma: 59.2% #34 Idaho: 58.7% #35 Connecticut: 58.5% #36 Virginia: 58.4 #37 North Carolina: 58.2% #38 New Jersey: 57.6% #39 Rhode Island: 57.4% #40 Indiana: 57.3% #41 West Virginia: 57.2% #42 Arkansas: 56.7% #43 Florida: 56.1% #44 Arizona: 54.3% #45 New York: 53.1% #46 Tennessee: 52.7% #47 Georgia: 52.6% #48 Nevada: 51.3% #49 Texas: 50.3% #50 California: 49.1% #51 Hawaii: 46.2% Weighted average: 61.3%
She reigns as Head of State, but does not rule. She is not totally powerless however. The Prime Minister visits her once a week to discuss matters of state. Having been monarch through every Prime Minister since Churchill, her knowledge and advice are not taken lightly. She has the power to veto laws, though this is never used. She has the power to threaten abdication, which would cause a constitutional crisis, and would probably force a General election. The queen is popular, and the Government whose actions caused this would not benefit. As the head of the armed forces, a military coup would have her at its head. This is not likely at the moment, but it was not beyond belief in the Wilson era.
Here's what I found at the www.freerepublic.com an online sanctuary for freedom hating facists. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Unbelieveable.
