why did the tor thread get locked

Discussion in 'About the Members' started by Zakariya04, Oct 17, 2007.

  1. Zakariya04 and it was Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,045
    yeah not bad actually now you come to mention it

    i was wondering that TOR must stand up and use her computer as it is on the cabinet behind where she is bening over!!.........its not really on a desk...
     
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. spuriousmonkey Banned Banned

    Messages:
    24,066
    never question boobs, just stare at them!
     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Nickelodeon Banned Banned

    Messages:
    10,581
    Nice tits.
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Stryder Keeper of "good" ideas. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,105
    It's funny she never mentions *her* defacement of the Wikipedia entry for 'Sciforums' (Which now is no longer editable).
    http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Sciforums


     
  8. Nickelodeon Banned Banned

    Messages:
    10,581
  9. Zakariya04 and it was Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,045
    Hey Stryder


    thank you for your input as always

    i think she would argue that she did this after she was banned

    ~~~~~~
    cheers
    zak
     
  10. Zakariya04 and it was Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,045
    come on Plazma you did not ahve to do that and close my poll.

    obviously its up to you whetehr you lift her ban, but come on dont be so hard

    i really dont undertsand why you dont thinks he is a nce girl!!!

    ~~~~~~~
    cheers
    zak
     
  11. Nickelodeon Banned Banned

    Messages:
    10,581
    He hee
     
  12. Zakariya04 and it was Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,045
    woops
     
  13. Stryder Keeper of "good" ideas. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,105
    I'm sure she would aruge that she'd done it while 'Emotionally Motivated' however she did use a Third-Party website to do it on which I believe would be a breach of their TOC as well as 'espionage' in regards to Sciforums itself. This issue of course is now 'water under the bridge' so to speak but as Plazma points out she shouldn't come back. (Not that she won't under pseudonyms, but if she does she should maintain a clearly different persona than 'herself')
     

Share This Page