why can't you ignore moderators? seriously, shouldn't there be fair play? if you can for example ignore Shorty, why can't you ignore a moderator? What if you find what the mod is saying repulsive and uncalled for, and hurtful? should you be forced to read the shit they write? and why don't the other moderators care? is it because they have a special mod club, and decide amoungst themselves who to try and push away from the forum? Are people aware that internet abuse is actually a crime? Invert nexus has already said in anouther thread that mods don't care about what the others say, so why should they get away with a lot more than us every day folk?
Because the software doesn't allow it. Nothing prevents you from doing what the software can't though. By the way, don't take it too personally. She's poking at mothers, a favorite subject of hers. She'll get her just desserts when her uterus squeezes out a little parasite all her own.
yes sure i read the thread, and i wont be reading it again, why did you say somthing to make her stop abusing people?
This is an evasion. The question is: if a moderator insults a member can the member then insult back, at a time of their choosing, without penalty? One free shot per insult. My answer is: yes. Yes she can. And my interest is: I would like to see two fishwives going at it hammer and tongs, please. I find it highly entertaining.
oh please sit down before you hurt yourself! however you are right if a moderator insults someone here then yes we should be able to insult back!
We should not strike, period. Striking someone is acting in a will to hurt the other, deal with passion and care and peacefully.
Well, then. I question your reading ability. And, no, I didn't say anything. That's not the question I was answering, was it? If you must know my personal decision, I've already told you. You took it personally, but she was simply ranting against mothers. A favorite topic of hers. But, if you'll read the thread, then you'll find this question answered: I suppose you thought I wouldn't answer this question as you answered it yourself. Thus, it was rhetorical. However, seeing as how you answered it incorrectly I thought I'd correct you on the matter.