This will sound like I'm just saying it now, but I actually suspected that to be the case, then I thought "no, that wouldn't make any sense". It still doesn't. I think I'm right and the english language is wrong in this instance.
whose car is this is the right one who's car is illformed grammaticlly and semanticlly whose car is this and this car is whose? LOL
whose car is this is the right one who's car is illformed grammaticlly and semanticlly whose car is this and this car is whose? LOL Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Lou: I'm pretty sure it's "its". I'm also pretty sure that when it has finished bathing in assmilk, it will no doubt give us another school lesson, it's very good at that.
I believe that she meant "it's," not "its," and I also believe that there's no other way her statement would make sense. Ah, uh.... all right. I don't see how that makes sense, but I've learned not to question Gendanken. All right, gadfly! When I want to hear Cerberus yapping, I'll throw you a bone. When I don't, I won't, and you can keep your three heads, Unrestraint, Obtrusion, and Stridence, all to yourself.
it's easy to think you're brave from a safe distance. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!