What is your IQ?

I take it back. Your brilliant wit is surely a sign of great intelligence.

And what a fiendishly clever way to rob your opposition of potential ammo, by presenting yourself as a cartoon duck.

feelgood.com?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

You have no idea.

Actually I don't present myself as a cartoon duck, that's just an avatar.
What sort of low-IQ idiot would assume that's how I see me, or how I'd like people to see me?
Keep thinking, try "double take" for one.
Try "piss take" for another.
There's no limit to the possibilities.

Various UK universities actually, but I could look at the "recommended" site if it'd make you feel more secure....

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

The low I.Q. idiot who wrote this?

...
​

Self-deprecating humor will make you appear harmless, it's true.

How easily you see through my weak defense mechanisms to my insecure core. I'm only writing this because I'm envious of your great intellect.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

You're suffering from some sort of confusion.

Self-deprecating humour?
Harmless?
You're missing the point entirely.

At least you're smart enough to recognise that

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Deep I don't get what you problem with Oli is..

 

Are children allowed on here ?

 

More likely your evading it because what kind of twit - especially one who purports to have a high I.Q. - glaringly contradicts himself within the space of two posts?

 

Contradict myself?
Maybe you're (wild guess here) missing the point again....

 

Oli didn't state anything of the sort.
In fact, he's one of the few that didn't post their IQ.

 

I did say I was one of the higher ones when asked.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Yes, our avatars don't represent us, but our monikers do.

I see your 'logic' now.

 

So what ? It seems Deep is insecure about something and is compensating.

 

I don't have a "moniker" I go by what I'm actually called.
So you don't see it at all.

 

What a wonderful hypocrite you are.

 

Now I'm a hypocrite because I don't use a pseudonym?
Explain the logic in that, please.

 

Right over your head.

 

So that's about 5-1 then?
Congratulations.

 

Let's make light of it.

It's for the best really.

 

So you're not going to explain my non-pseudonymous hypocrisy to me?
Leave me to continue in the dark?
I may commit it again.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Isaac Newton never sat a Stanford-Binet, but his was estimated to be well over 200. Einstein apparently was up around 180.

It's not something cast in stone, btw.
You would get a different I.Q. if you sat a test in the morning, than later in the day. The seasons probably affect I.Q., too, apart from emotional states (not ever examined in any way, so ignored completely), etc.

If you did a few test-runs (say with online Mensa ones), then sat a proper timed test, at an ideal time and in an ideal state of mind (after having a sufficient caloric intake), you should see a "personal best".

IOW, you can train, just like an athlete, to improve your score - even take bottles of pills so when you walk around you make strange rattling noises.