What is Time?

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by edtk, Jan 15, 2015.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. edtk Registered Member

    Messages:
    26
    Definitions do not come from the God. Definition can be accepted or not. You have accepted.

    Can you please click the link pasted in the paper? You will find very important contexts. For example, how to express meters in eV. Or seconds in eV. Or have you known these for ages?
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. edtk Registered Member

    Messages:
    26
    Sorry, now I have to go. Please gather your questions and tomorrow if I have time, I'll give you answers. BUT do your homework. Read my paper -- 10 minutes. And please note: I am not a neurologist, I don't cure hysteria.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,703

    You do not want to hear any reasons or facts that will show your hypothesis to be invalid.
    I'm not angry either, just somewhat mystified at so many that come here with delusions of grandeur and inflated ego.
    You have already posted in the wrong section, most probably to gain some attention after your last debacle attempt at putting the same nonsense.
    That is two banning offences....wrong section, and trying to skirt a moderator's previous decision.
    In summing, if you had any new definition of time, you would not be here...You would be getting it properly reviewed.
    But the truth is as I have mentioned...a collection of jumbled up scientifically sounding words to try and impress.
    Sorry, no one seems impressed.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. edtk Registered Member

    Messages:
    26
    Emotions, emotions, emotions... Do you know the word: FACT?
     
  8. edtk Registered Member

    Messages:
    26
    If the only thing you can do is crying over spilled milk please take me a favor and delete my all posts. Or tell me at least, where is the delete button.
     
  9. danshawen Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,950
    Please don't lose that thought!
     
  10. Russ_Watters Not a Trump supporter... Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,051
    Correct. And you haven't. So what?
    Oy, really? You can't even do simple dimensional analysis? No, I won't increase your hit count to see just how bad it gets.

    Let's try it this way: give me one testable prediction that your idea makes.
     
  11. edtk Registered Member

    Messages:
    26
    Emotion: envy. Fact: nothing. Cure: Refused.
     
  12. Dinosaur Rational Skeptic Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,856
    I have posted the following to various Threads relating to time.
    The above is not a quote: It is a paraphrase based on my not infallible memory. I Think it is from the preface to one of his books or essays on Relativity. I have read several articles containing very lengthy & confusing verbiage which did not seem to describe the concept of time any better than the above.

    It is interesting that Albert used bold or italics for before & after, implying that they should be considered primitive terms, not definable via the use of simpler terms or concepts.

    Note that an axiomatic system requires undefined primitive terms to avoid various problems associated with circular definitions.

    It is interesting that Albert did not mention the concept of the flow of time from past through the present into the future, which does seem to be a construct (illusion?) of the human mind rather than an objective process associated with reality.

    I can remember reading philosophy texts with multi-pages of word salad realting to time. None were close to being as cogent & succinct as the above by Albert.
     
  13. Russ_Watters Not a Trump supporter... Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,051
    Posts: gibberish. OP: trolling. Ban: shortly.
     
  14. origin In a democracy you deserve the leaders you elect. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,579
    Not at all. There was no envy, this is the science section and Russ simply asked you for a prediction from your idea that is testable. That is science. If you have none then you clearly do not have a theory.

    edit to add: It is obvious that you do not have a theory. You have what we call a unevidence wild ass conjecture.
     
  15. edtk Registered Member

    Messages:
    26
    Prediction: if a mass travels in the Universe and a>0 (acceleration of mass is grater than 0) and the gravity does not stop it, the acceleration will permanently increase.
    OR, there are more kinds of time, the dark matter uses its own time not our time.
    OR, light has time. That makes possible that photons and all particles work with algorithms that time runs .
    etc.
     
  16. origin In a democracy you deserve the leaders you elect. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,579
    So you are saying that if a rocket starts to accelerate and there is no gravity to stop it that it will accelerate forever? Even after it runs out of fuel?
     
  17. edtk Registered Member

    Messages:
    26
    I agree, it's simple science

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  18. edtk Registered Member

    Messages:
    26
    The are special galaxies out there that accelerate without fuel.
     
  19. origin In a democracy you deserve the leaders you elect. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,579
    Really? Could you please identify one of the 'special galaxies'?
     
  20. Russ_Watters Not a Trump supporter... Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,051
    That's just Newton's first and second laws.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton's_laws_of_motion

    It doesn't provide any value for your idea, unless you present a testable prediction of your idea that is different from what is already incorporated into current science.
    Please state those as testable predictions. That's what the question was.
     
  21. edtk Registered Member

    Messages:
    26
    That was. I have to go. Next time! Chiao
    Yes. Every galaxy is like this. New fact for you: our Universe expands. But now I really have to go. Ciao!
     
  22. Russ_Watters Not a Trump supporter... Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,051
    It could be externally fueled (lasser propulsion). That isn't specified. So this "prediction" has no real value since it is just a cumbersome restatement of something that has been known for 400 years.
     
  23. edtk Registered Member

    Messages:
    26
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page