Ah, yes. The crank's way of saying "I can't find any logical argument to support my view but I'm going to stick with it anyway". Understood. You. Are. Wrong.
Reality is potential become manifest. Based on the definition where; "potential is that which may become reality". https://www.thefreedictionary.com/potential https://www.thefreedictionary.com/becoming
Can't see it, but you can feel it when you drop a hammer on your toe!......Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Says who? According to your logic , an object cannot decrease or increase in mass . Gravity potential is mass potential .
I do (for one[1]). The slight clue was my name on the post. I'm not sure how you arrive at that (false) conclusion since it was neither stated nor implied. No. Using made up terms doesn't make your nonsense any less nonsense. 1 Science, in general, also agrees with me.
Please provide a link where science agrees with you ! I'll happily demonstrate where the physics agrees with me . I'm not here to play games , I'm a serious amateur scientist .
I give that 4 out of 5 Delete one word to get 4 out of 4 Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
It's funny how you consider yourself above providing links that support YOUR claims, but require others to give links when they simply disagree with you. Apart from from the fact that you should have done so earlier... go ahead (but you can't - except trivially: e.g. reduced/ increased gravity). No you're not. You're a deluded (and dishonest) fool who thinks that making sh*t up is a substitute for learning science.
I don't need to learn science , I've already learnt science and I'm in a position in my knowledge to be able to make comments on science . You know as I know when metal is heated and expands it gains more mass . Your denial of one simple amateur statement is intriguing . Unless a link is provided that leaves diversity in my mind . This thread seems to be sinking off topic . What is reality ? Are you going too deny this ?
Wrong: as demonstrated in nearly every post you make. And? How does that apply "air becoming lighter or heavier"? As is the fact that you still haven't provided the link you said you could. Apart from the appalling grammar I feel that I should point out the original claim was yours. You still haven't backed this up. Well, obviously, YOU don't know (as shown in post #68). That the thread has gone off-topic? No. (Although that is, in large part, your own doing).
Well , I consider I've given you everything you need to understand what I'm saying . It isn't on me to understand me .
So you can't actually provide the link that you said you would? No it's not. But it is on you to make yourself comprehensible to others. At least you're consistent with the delusion and dishonesty...
I never said I was going to provide a link , I said I'de provide a demonstration and asked you for a link to your denial . This is premier league science , not basic stuff .
