what is BIS theory related to earthquake?

Discussion in 'The Cesspool' started by puneetsaxena321, Aug 22, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. i read an article meat eating causes earthquake in which there is reference about EPW(Einsteinian Pain Waves theory).please tell what is Einsteinian Pain Waves theory?does it really exist?
    there is another theory given named BIS.please comment on it.i am posting that article too here to know that is it scientifically right. please critically examine the article.

    source: actionagainstpoisoning.com/N ... tropy.html
    Dr. Madan Mohan Bajaj
    A New Approach by M M Bajaj, Ibrahim and Vijayraj Singh; H. B. Prakashan, Indore;
    This book is a forceful plea to stop slaughter of animals, birds, and (even) fish because it will avert earthquakes. It is difficult to say what prompted the authors – all physicists of fame and high learning – to enter the rough and tumble of geology and that, too, of earthquakes. But, then, science has its own angularities. After all, the high priest of modern science, Albert Einstein, also meddled with the science of geology by propagating EPW (Einsteinian Pain Waves) theory.

    Whatever one's predilections, it has to be conceded that the idea is unique. And novelty is not the only argument in favour of the book which is actually based on paper(s) read by the authors. The BIS (Bajaj-Ibrahim-Singh) Theory is claimed to be a further development on EPW of Einstein. The book claims it is possible to forecast earthquakes which are caused by excessive killing of animals. Now either it is all based on 'real' correlations or is a set of spurious ones. The answer would depend upon whether, and a priori, one is willing to subscribe to the theory whose validity is all but proven so far. And to that extent, the book is truly novel and hence absolutely and eminently readable. After all, science still does not have even the modicum of an answer as to why the earthquakes happen and how they can be predicted with reasonable accuracy. The book certainly fills the gaps in the science of seismology which is still a nascent science.

    The argument, otherwise highly technical and full of scientific jargon, given so lucidly and simply in the abstract of the book is quite unique to say the least. It is based on the, "reports received" from different parts of the world that several earthquakes have the history of millions of animals being butchered in or near the high risk seismic zones. Hence the suspicion and the scientific inquiry that organising the butchering of animals in the abattoirs worldwide has something to do with the quakes. The book claims to have studied the complex role of nociceptive waves (or the waves generated by the immense noise by the animals on the verge of being butchered) in shear-wave splitting which is related to seismic anisotropy. This splitting is associated with the cracks in the crust aligned by stress. The origin of earthquakes due to the interaction of nociception waves with gravity waves is critically examined in the book. An earthquake of 8 Richter occurs only when the resonant frequency is extremely high. Low frequency resonances lead to earthquakes of 0.1 to 0.2 Richter. Low frequency resonances are hardly felt or realised by the ordinary people. High frequency resonances (originating due to the slaughter of millions of animals daily for years together) lead to powerful singularities with the gravity waves.

    Dying Animals Cause Acoustic Anisotropy
    Now the point which the authors have tried to make is that acoustic anisotropy leads to a very strong anisotropic stress on a rock. The daily butchering of thousands of animals continually for several years generates acoustic anisotropy due to Einsteinian Pain Waves (EPW) emitted by dying animals. And the accumulated acoustic anisotropy is found to be related with the stress history of rocks.

    The book claims that since the EPW travel a great distance with time, abattoirs of one country may lead to havoc in another country. But then comes a final "warning" from the scientists laced with spirituality: '...we should close down all the abattoirs (visible and hidden) of the world. Our environmental problems are responsible for the mega-event of earthquakes. ' If this had come from a religious saint, people would have taken it at face value. But, coming from scientists of some fame, the approach needs a careful analysis sans religiosity which is a tall order given the Indian context.

    The central theme of the book that shear wave splitting occurs possibly due to aligned fluid-filled inclusions and abattoirs, is open to question, and needs a further in-depth study, which the authors claimed to have done with a promise that a fresh book of over 600 pages is coming out shortly on this very aspect. However, the authors have been fair to mention, if not examine in the introductary part, all existing hypotheses on the subject though finally, they settle down on their own hypothesis of large-scale abattoir activity being the causative agents for major earthquakes. In chapter 2 they move to the complex theory which is a set of mathematical formulae which may not be of much interest to a person not properly initiated in mathematical and statistical mumbo jumbo.

    Latur Ealthquake Explained
    It is "Experimental Aspects" in chapter 3 which is absolutely revolutionary and candid. After preliminary observation as to how the nociception waves (EPW) interact with the earth's natural rhythmatic vibrations and lead to responses which are extremely powerful (of the order of 10 40 MW) causing crack density (CD) which is directly proportional to EPW – itself a result of 'animals butchered daily' the authors come straight to the most recent of the Indian calamities – the Latur (Khillari) earthquake. And from here it is a non-stop journey to earthquakes at various places. Indian earthquakes of Utterkashi, Assam follow the Latur tragedy. Then comes America where the earthquakes of Northridge (1994), Long Beach (California – 1933), Landers (California -1992), San Francisco (1906), New Madrid (Missouri – 1811-12) have been mentioned. Russia is next where Neftegorsk (1995) finds a major mention. Kanto (1923), Nobi (1891), Kita-Tango. (1927), Sankiru Tsunami (1933), Shizuoka (1935), Tonankal (1944), Nankai (1948), Fukui (1948), Off-Tokachi (1952), Kjta-Mino (1961), Nigata (1964), Off-Tokachi (1968), Kobe (1995) – all of Japan – have also been described not so much as a part of scientific inquiry but to demonstrate the pattern and familiarity of the authors with what they are talking about.

    Some of the data accumulated from aforementioned places, juxtaposed with the famous study by Nemichand has been put to productive use by the authors to make a comprehensive table of strong earthquakes of the 20th century and the date from 3,937 ,,officially recognised major abbatoirs" in different parts of India to establish further the hypothesis proprounded that earthquakes are caused by large scale animal slaughter. Some of the obiter dicta by the authors are certainly open to serious question.

    The "Theory" will be Tested
    The hypothesis propounded in the book will be testable very shortly when in the wake of "Mad Cow" disease afflicting cows in England resulting in an overall ban on exports of beef from England to other European Union countries there is a proposal for the 'destruction' of an estimated 4.5 million to 11 million cows in England. Whatever the number of cows destroyed eventually it will surely be the first time in the world anywhere that so many animals will be killed at one go. And going by the BIS Theory it must (automatically) produce a major earthquake. And going by the same, BIS analysis, England or at least neighbouring Europe can hope to have the biggest jolt in history - not figuratively but literally – in the shape of an earthquake.
    From the Book
    In the words of Nils Bohr, 'Prediction is difficult, especially of the future.' Despite this, one of the objectives of the present investigation is to explore the possibility of earthquake prediction based on well defined hard core principles.
    Mathematicians and scholars can predict the tides. Then, why do they have so much trouble in predicting earthquakes? Accurate tables of the time of high or low tide can be worked out months or even years ahead. Earthquake forecasts often go wrong within a few days, sometimes within a few hours. People are accustomed to the difference. They are not surprised when a heat wave turns out to be a blizzard. In contrast, if the tide table predicted low tide but the beach was under water, there would probably be a riot. Of course, the two systems are different. The mechanism of earthquakes is extremely complex. It involves following parameters: (1) air pressure, (2) tectonic plate movement, (3) Einsteinian pain wave intensity, (4) geographical location, (5) local rate of killing of animals, (6) underground nuclear testing, (7) faultlines in the rock, (8) volcanic activity, etc. Compared to earthquakes, tides are much simpler, because they can be easily predicted.
    We speak of the unpredictable aspects of earthquakes just as if we were talking about rolling dice or letting an air balloon loose to observe its erratic path as the air is ejected. Since there is no clear relationship between cause and effect, such phenomenon are said to have random elements. Yet there was little reason to doubt that precise predictability could, in principle, be achieved. This fundamental randomness has come to be called chaos.

    Recent supplementary commentary of one of the authors, Dr. Vijay Ray Singh:
    Bisology is a new subject which has developed recently. It deals with the Breakdown of Integrated Systems and indiscriminate slaughtering or Brutal and Intense Slaughtering.
    Basically it is the subject which has originated from the Bajaj-Ibrahim-Singh effect, which was reported by us for the first time in Suzdal (Russia) in 1995. Some noted scholars have written whole chapters on Bisology in their books. The discovery of the BIS effect was so sensa-tional that an Indian Journal brought out a special issue devoted to the subject. Several young scholars have studied this subject in their Ph.D. theses submitted to different universities. We have been extremely fortunate to have the blessings of a great teacher, Prof. Nemi Chand-Jain in the proliferation of our scientific ideas regarding vegetarianism and the direction in which true science should move.

    regards
     
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    The theory might. But then again you can find a crank theory on just about anything on the internet.

    Right.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Source please.

    Possibly. But unique doesn't necessarily mean correct.

    That's a good start.

    And then it goes bad. Effectively you're giving us a circular argument. The correlations that "prove" your theory are valid correlations if, and only if, you accept a priori that the "theory" is "all but proven". Clever. Not.

    Really? Not a clue?

    While there's certainly room for improvement I don't think not eating animals is going to help predict them.

    Of course the book does also demonstrate that nociceptive waves exist, doesn't it?

    And, presumably that nociceptive waves interact (somehow) with gravity waves...
    And when you say "critically examines" is this critical examination from the aspect of "it might be spurious" or the alternative aspect of "all but proven"?

    Oh wait. Are these "nociceptive waves" actually nociceptive or acoustic?

    Um, doesn't this contradict
    You think? Any particular saints in mind?

    I'll say.

    Ah right. Mad cow disease and slaughter - 1999.
    Major Earthquake - um, when was that, exactly? I failed to notice it...

    Yeah. I wonder why I get the feeling this is spam. And crackpot spam at that.
     
    Last edited: Aug 22, 2010
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Dear Dywyddyr

    Well, Christchurch just copped it 2 days ago- Canterbury plains is the cow and sheep slaughter capital of NZ

    Gujarat copped it in 2001(?) epicentre at Bhuj some slaughter house is there, I heard. 100,000 (?)killed- mostly Moslem ( cow killers) names

    Of course, the earthquakes can happen anywhere not related directly to the place of generation of pain.

    By the way, have you got anything against letting innocent animals live?
    One thing is for sure, we have no control over nature( but someone has, or is controlling), so watch out when she catches us up and squashes our puny "scientific" attempts to deride the law.
    Law means a lawmaker, otherwise there is no meaning to a law unless someone enforces it.
    We are not independent and we are certainly under control at every moment.
    Step out of line and feel the effect.
    Ignorance of the law and transgression of it is the cause of our suffering, ask any criminal.
    Check out Manu Samhita (smrti)

    He who permits (the slaughter of an animal), he who cuts it up, he who kills it, he who buys or sells (meat), he who cooks it, he who serves it up, and he who eats it, (must all be considered as) the slayers (of the animal). [v.5.51.]
    There is no greater sinner than that (man) who, though not worshipping the gods or the manes, seeks to increase (the bulk of) his own flesh by the flesh of other (beings). [v.5.52.]
    Me he (mam sah)’ will devour in the next (world), whose flesh I eat in this (life); the wise declare this (to be) the real meaning of the word ‘flesh’ (mamsah). [v.5.55.]

    Don't we think anything is in store for us?
    Will we be the first ones to escape death or suffering of any kind?
    Only a complete and utter fool will deny any higher control( ultimately culminating in control by the highest)
    Look in any dictionary and we find the definition of the Supreme Being : the Supreme Controller

    We kill at our own peril.
    Let anyone ground zero at any earthquake ( or any " natural disaster") zone and try peddling their pseudo science or God defiance there and see if their attitude is appreciated.

    They might even meet their Maker there!

    Better though, try to think "why?"

    At least there are some honest sincere scientists out there trying to practically explain why rather than the ignorance passing as science conveniently ignoring the real problems for the sake of a few quid.

    But thanks anyway for your contribution and hope someone can enlighten us on the cause and solution to eathquakes before we become the next victims, like all the brave scientists of the past who could not save themselves.

    There is order and control everywhere and the chaos only arises in our minds when we see our ideas and plans thwarted and smashed to smithereens, as happens time and time again.
    When will we open our eyes and see the plain facts?

    For the stubborn disbelieving irrationalists,
    the Supreme controller manifests as time, and takes away everything at the time of death, if not before.

    I really applaud Messrs Bajaj Ibrahim and Singh for their inspired analysis which they seemed to prove mathematically but theres no doubt that slaughter on the roads, abortions, terrorism, war( including civil) and increasingly relentless punishments ( that's the best way to describe it) inflicted by Mother Nature( Who's the Father?) must be a cause for concern by everyone.
    Bye now and cheers- got to go
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Trippy ALEA IACTA EST Staff Member

    Messages:
    10,890
    I'm putting this nonsense where it belongs.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page