What does God do?

Discussion in 'Religion' started by James R, Nov 11, 2017.

  1. Musika Last in Space Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,325
    You say you are not insisting on anything, and then in your next paragraph you insist.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,743
    What exactly am I insisting?
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Musika Last in Space Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,325
    That the existence of physical laws negate any sentience since, ya know, we can't enact physical laws.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,743
    I am not insisting that at all.
     
  8. Musika Last in Space Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,325
    Then why point to the existence of physical laws as an argument that negates a sentient precursor?
     
  9. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,743
    I don't.
     
  10. Musika Last in Space Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,325
    You do
     
  11. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,743
    I know what I wrote. Nothing of what you said follows from what I said.

    Make a point already, or step aside.
     
  12. Musika Last in Space Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,325
    Maybe you think you wrote something else, but for the rest of us mere mortals, we have no option other than to go by what you post. Presenting physics/divine sentience as mutually exclusive is a pretty clear dichotomy.
     
    Last edited: Jun 8, 2018
  13. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,743
    It is Bowser's assertion that God is actively manipulating planets and atoms today.

    Our understanding of science says that planets are operated by gravity, which we understand to have been in existence and unchanging since the dawn of time. Same with atoms.

    So, if Bowser's assertion were true (that God is actively moving things today - not that he say, set them up 13 billion years ago and let them run on their own) then our understanding the universe could not be right.

    I'm simply asking Bowser if he is aware of the implications of his assertion.
     
  14. Musika Last in Space Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,325
    So God has no other means of exhibiting being "active" other than to do it in the all too familiar manner of "fumbling around".
     
  15. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,743
    Again, don't put words in my mouth.

    Go back and read Bowser's assertion - post 474. I simply presented some examples as questions. He said he thinks those are God.
     
  16. Musika Last in Space Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,325
    Bowser replied "He is that and more."
    I guess you missed the "more" bit, and simply proceeded with the "that", and gave us your run down on being active according to the limits of physics .... which is of course the limit of our conditioned experience.
    This led to the query why you are insisting on using such a questionable yardstick in this discussion.

    About 3 posts earlier to yours Capracus kind of hit the nail on the head. If you read that first it might have saved you the trouble of barking up a tree that the cat never even ran up.
     
  17. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,743
    I didn't miss it. "More" just makes the assertion worse.

    Still missing the point here. You are over-interpreting my words.

    I am simply pointing out that our understanding of planets and atoms says one thing, and Bowser's belief says another.
    If he thinks that God is actively moving the planets now (i.e. today, not set up 14 billion years ago) then that is in direct conflict with our understanding.

    I make no assertions except the logical implications of his belief.
     
  18. Musika Last in Space Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,325
    If you interpret "more" as an invitation to do a roll call of physical laws, you certainly did miss it.

    As already pointed out, other posters did not miss it.
     
  19. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,743
    I think you need to step back and read a little more of the thread. I think you've jumped in at my post, without bothering to look at the context.
     
  20. Musika Last in Space Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,325
    On the contrary, I don't think you understand the nature of the question being asked, much less what is being offered as an answer.
    You can see Capracuses reply, a few posts before yours, for further hints.
     
  21. river

    Messages:
    11,269
    god puts intelligence in life .

    Not the abrahamic god

    But a being who expands its self into life . An expression of intelligence which is expressed in evolution of all living beings .

    Inotherwords , the Universe is based on a being which spreads its' intelligence in all living things.

    Sometimes good , sometimes bad .
     
  22. StrangerInAStrangeLand SubQuantum Mechanic Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    15,380
    A YouTube comment : I bet gods bored as f**k if he does exist, dude knows everything there is to know and he's done everything it's possible to do an infinite number of times, bet he wished he could just die and escape the eternal drudgery.

    <>
     
  23. socratus Registered Member

    Messages:
    49
    If absolute God exist then He must have an absolute Reference frame.
    Only from this absolute Reference frame God can create the universe
    using physical / math laws, formulas, equations.
    ==========
     

Share This Page