What are the questions science cannot answer?

uf..

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

The important ones.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

GENESIS SCIENCE - VS - SCIENCE.



It is appropriate to measure any reasonable scientific counter thus far from this forum of the premise that no action can occur with ONE:

CHECK MATE.

One down. Genesis science wins.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

The next thing to pose is:


DEFINE INFINITY?

DEFINE FINITY?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Is that an anagram for "you lose"?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

how can oxymoron win?

 

Brilliant observation which should beget the Nobels. Alas it has nothing to do with this thread.

 

actually it has everything to do with this thread and your spamming religious mythology as history and science

 

SCIENCE: THERE IS NO 'ONE' IN THE UNIVERSE.

But you said:

nothing.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

that statement implies..there is more than one..
the question becomes how many more than one..

some would argue there is two..
up,down
left,right
in,out
god,devil
good,bad
etc..

some would argue three..
father,son,spirit
in,out,in between
left,right,center
good,bad,indifferent
etc..

i argue four..
mental,emotional,physical,spiritual..
mind,heart,body,soul.
think,feel,know,believe

father,son,communion,spirit
left,right,up,down
good,bad,accepted,indifferent

anyone for five?

 

earth, wind, water, fire, spirit.

 

Now were on the same page. It does not matter how many more than one - technically, scientifically, mathematically, logically - there is no absolute ONE in the universe; this is a deeply cadenced premise and not yet undertood by the multitude. The point is, no action can occur with one. It takes two to tango applies.

 

Joseph

This is your version of logic?

I got news for you. It is not logic. It is not rational thinking. It is not science.

Instead, it is absolutist, superstition-based, religious thinking. It does not belong in a science forum.

 

There is no ONE in the universe. Logic. Rational thinking. Science. You forgot to prove me wrong - that is what science oriented folk are obligated to do - not dismiss because of where it comes from.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

To keep saying, like some superstitious mantra, "there is no ONE in the universe", actually means nothing. Cannot you see that?

 

No action can occur with one - but we see continual actions in the universe. Do you not see that?

By extension, it means a finite universe never happened with only one entity. A minimum of two entities is encumbent, each entity had to be independently programmed to identify and align with the other. There is no science where the foundation is unscientific.

 

Joseph

That is not the basis of science. A good scientist does not make assumptions of that nature. Science deals with what is. Not what we think should be so.

Talking of a minimum of two entities is not scientific. We find out what is there. If it matches with existing models of reality, fine and good. If what is there is different to expectation, then we have to change those models.

Saying that something must be, means nothing. Your two entities mean nothing. The only thing that means something is what empirical evidence tells us.

We know that the beginning of our universe as we know it was the Big Bang. Cosmologists can describe the Big Bang in detail, back to within a few millionths of a second of its inception. That is reality.

Trying to go back to the origin of the Big Bang, or earlier, is not reality. Good science, at this point in time, requires us to accept that we do not know what caused the Big Bang. Imposing assumptions, as you have tried to do, is lousy science.

 

I am dealing with 'what is' - you are not. Please show how a single entity can perform an action, or where this contradicts any accepted science premises, or any science which shows the oppositte.

 

Is the first declaration the universe is finite - not science? How about the first recorded listing of life form groups by terrain category? Or the first separation of medicine [a science faculty] from the occult not science? Perhaps you are looking for the word 'SCIENCE' before calling anything science?

PS: There is no human group with more scientific prowess then the followers of the Hebrew bible: I'd check the Nobels before making such bold statements.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

We have claimed to go to the millionth second of the BB, define its temperatures and expansion rates. Your own premise the BB fathoming is not reality, really means we are on the wrong track. Whatever we may find of the BB or even if this theory is validated, one thing we can be and must be assured of, with no confusion from a scientific premise: the first entity will not, cannot be a singular entity.

Perhaps you should admit not thinking of the premise I presented, there is no ONE in the uni - this is all I can glean from the posts of shock around here, while it is quite astonishing none have acknowkedged the simple and concrete science in it? I am not even a rocket scientist.