I don't care where your spam started. Nope. Your opinion is still moronic, inaccurate and poorly informed. And a video was made showing that claim to be complete horseshit. You ignored the video. Still quick bits, but the astronauts are barely moving. The flag is still not billowing, no resistance, and the direction of the pole has no bearing on the orientation of the flag. All impossible. Your insistence on restating your clueless opinion doesn't suddenly make it correct. Nope. Stating horseshit doesn't make it correct. The same rules apply to cloth in water. Only a moron would not see this. If they let clueless cowards into a debating hall, they would be laughing at you. I addressed the issue succinctly. It is bullshit opinion. Bare assertion, go and google it. You seem confused with the word "proof" and your "idiotic and very ignorant opinion". He is not a sophist, and you don't know him. No source will confirm him as a known sophist, you are a liar. Pathetic. You are the biggest waste of space on the internet. Quite clearly it IS true. I guarantee you will raise it again somewhere, like the dishonest person you are. The spamming comedian. Yeah try again: They aren't from Earth, no plausible scenarios there. They aren't meteorites, no plausible scenarios there. They could not possibly have been collected in secret from numerous sites with this secret and massive space program you plucked out of your butt! No plausible scenarios at all. They came from the Moon, because the entire geologist community agree on the matter. The evidence that they are from a low gravity, volcanic astral body, with micrometeorite impacts, dry as a bone, but with oxygen isotopes matching with the Earth, lead to the overwhelming conclusion that they cannot be anywhere else BUT from the Moon. You cowardly avoided my posts: The rocks have been analysed thousands of times, for an internet zero like you to suggest they are all mistaken is comedic nonsense. Tell me exactly how you compare rocks brought back from the Moon with "real moon rocks"?! The Soviet samples show perfect correlation with Apollo ones. "The rocks cannot be from Earth. They have no terrestrial weathering from atmosphere and water. They show evidence of formation in low gravity. They show billions of years of solar wind exposure causing solar isotopes. Their exteriors contain strong helium 3. Many have impact craters from micro-meteors. There are also numerous 3m long core samples. They cannot be from meteors. There is no crust. The outside He3 is still intact, as are the zap pits. They again have no terrestrial weathering and are drier than anything found on this planet. That leaves the bullshit and impossible 842lbs of samples magically retrieved remotely with not a single scrap of evidence. Even now the technology to do this is ludicrously difficult." You don't know what the word plausible means. Hundreds of pounds of Apollo samples have been distributed for analysis!! Noting your total inability to provide one solitary scrap of evidence for your claims, that must also include the planting of science experiments, laser reflectors, thousands of pictures and video - it seems you are full of crap! AND To Mr Fat - where is your response to this? "Actually what she says is that the scientists who worked at the company she worked at, sold out for money. To use somebody talking about corruption within the Nuclear power industry is completely irrelevant. This tarring of all scientists with the same brush is an act of subterfuge called poisoning the well. It ignores the fact that anybody who makes claims about a hoax is subject to these same parameters. The startling fact about this "whistleblower", is that she makes a whole lot of money talking about this freely and openly, yet the evil powers haven't seen fit to silence her! Bunkum. Now all you have to do is to establish any single scientist tied to the Apollo programs who has spoken out about this. There are thousands of retired ones, not needing research grants or money, yet nobody has voiced an alternate opinion to the correct official account. There are millions of physics students throughout the world who offer no objection to the calculus involved in Lunar gravity, space radiation or radio transmissions. There are large numbers of engineers in all countries who also do not dispute the efficacy of the Apollo hardware. Orbital mechanics which is a very complex subject supports all aspects of the Apollo program. To suggest they are all keeping quiet implies that they are all aware of a hoax and simply doing so to maintain funding and to stay alive. Bunkum."