We never went to the moon.

Discussion in 'Conspiracies' started by Ryndanangnysen, Mar 4, 2015.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. FatFreddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    496
    It is a little ambiguous now that you mention it. I'll reword it.

    In post #740, do you think that David C addressed the issues I raised post #730 adequately?
    http://www.sciforums.com/threads/we-never-went-to-the-moon.145207/page-37#post-3495628

    David C seems to think that the media will expose the government if it finds out about a scandal such as faking the moon landings and I think the media will not rat on the government. What do all of you think?


    I haven't responded to this because I think it's just an attempt to muddy the waters to confuse the viewers but I'll go ahead and respond. I haven't looked into the time line because I can't see how it matters.

    Here's the issue for those who tuned in late.


    (2:35 time mark)

    See reply #21 herre for more info.
    http://www.apollohoax.net/forum/index.php?topic=993.15


    The flag moved without being touched because it was hit by moving air and all of the scenarios put forward by the Apollo-believers have been shown to be wrong. Please tell us how the time line is relevant.


    edit ten minutes later
    --------------------------------

    Here's a good discussion on the flag.
    http://www.politicalforum.com/index...-apollo-15-flag.438617/page-7#post-1065759869
     
    Last edited: Jan 3, 2018
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,543
    You know, these dumbass conspiracies would be harder to pull off than an actual Moon landing.
     
    sideshowbob likes this.
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Beer w/Straw Transcendental Ignorance! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,918
    "Does a Donald Trump shit in the woods?"

    I'm sure CNN would be all over that one if it were credible.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. sideshowbob Sorry, wrong number. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,587
  8. Michael 345 Looking for Bali in Nov Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,681
    It would clear the waters

    You underestimate the intelligence of the viewers

    Have not looked into the time line, in my opinion, because that would involve doing actual work (ie checking out the facts in the situation)

    I'm NOT interested in why the flags waved. Just did it happen 2 minutes after set up, 3 hours, 6 hours?

    Please check the time line for each of the landings because trust me it will / does matter

    Do some research on your claims please

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  9. Xelasnave.1947 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,603
    No I think he missed the opportunity to dismantle your arguement piece by piece and let you off lightly.
    You made a shotgun presentation which received an expected responce.
    I have suggested you present one thing at a time in your words so we can discuss your observations yet you dont do this and we all miss the opportunity to look at your concerns.
    I didnot look at the post and as I have said I will discuss anything if you present it but I wont be looking at tv to work out what worries you.
    Well the media may try to cover things up certainly but when it all boils down they are hungry for news and the more scandel the better it would seem.
    Poor old Mr Nixon obviously did not benefit from any cover up and he was the president.
    But two young reporters pulled at a thread until the whole cloth unraveled.
    Look if you work thru what you have one concern at a time, each concern can be addressed.
    Your current method has folk like me stepping back because its too much at once.
    I know you are excited and want to bury us with your evidence but that approach will never work.
    However if you explain each point clearly I for one can con entrate upon what you say, I can think about what you say and remember it will take only one clear point to prove your case.
    The flag for example, it is interesting but can by reasonably explained away.
    So the flag wont get you there.
    So next the rocks. Well its seems it wo t do it either.
    But then you point to a photo with an office building in the background you have a case.
    It only takes one thing and you must ask yourself ...do I have it.

    Alex
     
  10. FatFreddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    496
  11. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,543
    Try addressing the fact, Fat.
     
  12. Michael 345 Looking for Bali in Nov Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,681
    Nooooo I would -as I did - not diagnosis - SOME non medical give OPINIONS

    Not seen any of your postings, seen enough of that garbage - it's rubbish which is supposed to prove we never went to the moon right?

    Don't need to repeat watching stuff which lowers my IQ

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    So yes you got that right

    By the way how is the time line for the waving flags going?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  13. Xelasnave.1947 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,603
    Its like you ignore our requests freddy.
    Well this is my last involvement in this thread.
    Goodbye. Not playing so taking my bat and going home...
    Enjoy the sound of silence.
    Alex
     
  14. FatFreddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    496
  15. Michael 345 Looking for Bali in Nov Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,681
    I can't recall seeing air in the video. You must have very keen eyesight

    So I take it you personally are not going to do some personal research about the time line of the flag waving correct?

    And your not even going to farm out the question to like minded people correct?

    Surely you have more than 6 buddies and can give them a mission each and then all you need to do is collate the 6 together

    Oh well I tried to help you get some rock solid evidence but it seems not to be

    Pity

    Good night Gracie

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  16. David C The print that nails this troofer Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    248
    Garbage conclusion. The footage shows a really tiny movement that could very simply be down to the following:

    Ground vibration.
    The pole settling into its support, given that it has only just been erected.
    Regolith kicked forward hitting the pole gently.
    Electrostatic discharge.
    Camera blooming.

    The idea it is air is the only conclusion that DOESN'T fit! From frame grabs, the tiny movement starts the split second Scott enters the frame, when he is over 2 metres away. Air would only make the flag move when he was very close to it, at most a foot away. Also, the pendulum motion of nylon sways for a ridiculous amount of time for atmosphere.

    And you know this why?

    The viewers want to know why the lens flares move, can you explain?
     
  17. FatFreddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    496
    This has all been discussed earlier in the thread. Go back to page four and start reading.
     
  18. Michael 345 Looking for Bali in Nov Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,681
    Nothing there about the flag waving time line - for each of the missions please

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  19. FatFreddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    496
    You're the one who thinks this is relevant so you provide the info and explain why it's relelvant. I say the only thing that matters is whether the movement of the flag in relation to the astronaut shows it was in atmosphere.

    You seem to be trying to muddy the waters because this flag anomaly has you people checkmated.
     
  20. Michael 345 Looking for Bali in Nov Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,681
    OK OK OK you are not going to provide a time line

    Byeeee

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  21. David C The print that nails this troofer Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    248
    Your claims were garbage, you lied and didn't follow up problems pointed out to you. You do this all the time!
     
  22. origin In a democracy you deserve the leaders you elect. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,353
    Of course he does and he will continue to, that is what a conspiracy theorist is all about, facts and reality are a nuisance that can be ignored.
     
  23. FatFreddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    496
    Can you point to something specific?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page