We never went to the moon.

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Quite the opposite.
In a debating hall, as here, the onus is on your group to make your case.
Your group is making an assertion for which you concede there is no evidence.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

We never did go to the moon. When a piece of it landed in my back garden, it went very nice on some cauliflower, and they never mentioned its tastiness in their so-called "reports" that it's quite clear they never went.
Now prove me wrong, please!
You can't! Therefore I'm right and we never went to the moon.
Case closed.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Look to end all this ; speculation on this topic ; let's just have a telescope that has the resolution to find what was left behind on the moon from the Apollo missions .

End of story . Stop messing around .

It's not hard .

 

Hi River.
Actually it is really hard because you need a rather huge telescope, cant remember how big but so big I doubt if we will build one.
Sorry I cant say how big maybe someone knows I might have a google see what turns up.
Alex

 

http://www.skyandtelescope.com/observing/how-to-see-all-six-apollo-moon-landing-sites/
The above will help you river.
Alex

 

Regardless let's get to it .

 

Alex it's not the sites ; the landings ; it's being able to focus in on the equipment left behind . That should be there . And this is what should be the focus.

 

Why?

The people who know it happened don't need more proof.
The people who think it didn't happen will never believe any amount of proof.

 

I know it happened .

Regardless

Build a telescope that is able to bring the equipment left behind on the moon in full and complete resolution.

I'm sure of the proof ; that we did land on the moon and the equipment is there .

river

 

But to what end?
Hoaxers won't believe it any more than they believe the mountain of proof already available.

 

Sure

But it would be so much harder to deny .

 

Nonsense! Why should NASA and the scientific world spend huge amounts of money to placate idiocy and conspiracy nutters?
They have hard enough job as it is getting money for worthwhile research, rather than placating to hoons and nuts.
We went to the Moon and landed on its surface 6 times, and 12 men walked on its surface ...Fact!......Fuck wasting money placating and patronising idiocy and conspiracy nuts, even if we could.

 

I have it.
We seek croud funding (from mostly those who say we did not go) to build a really large scope.
Let them have a look at the Moon and then incorporate this new large scope in the various current legitimate programs.
Owning a telescope is like owning a boat you always want one just a little bigger than the one you have. I am up to a 12 inch but really want a 16 inch.
What do these folk say about the rocks from the Moon.... Forget that I dont want to know what they say about anything really.

 

As some one above has said, there is no convincing such cranks that indulge in such outrageous conspiracies. Sad...

 

I've never seen this flag anomaly explained to the satisfaction of a thinking person that it wasn't air that made it move.

Apollo 15 flag, facing air resistance; proving the fraud of alleged manned moon landings.

(2:37 time mark)

(reply #21)
http://www.apollohoax.net/forum/index.php?topic=993.15

I've never seen the movement of Collins' jacket corner when he was exercising supposedly halfway to the moon explained to the satisfaction of a thinking person that the footage wasn't taken in strong gravity.
http://www.apollohoax.net/forum/index.php?topic=1145.0

If one of them wanted to go public, the press wouldn't report it...
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=144487&page=37&p=4731597&viewfull=1#post4731597

...and it would be downright dangerous for him to do so.



It would also be career-suicide.

Read Chomsky's analysis of the cold war and get back to me.
http://libcom.org/history/articles/cold-war-1940-1989?quicktabs_1=0

You're ignoring the anomalies that prove the hoax.
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=144487


You people keep talking about picturs of the landing sites. Pictures are fakable so they don't prove anything.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qc2kijG8YdY


You people have the attitude that you've got substantial arguments but you don't. You've got nothing.

 

When you are as dumb and deluded as an armadillo's faeces the challenge of denial is minimal.

 

Anomalies don't prove. Anomalies merely call into question.

I asked if your group had any evidence of the hoax itself. Documents, testimonials, photos, abandoned studios, boxes of equipment - anything.
Do you?

 

I am anyone and you are full of it. That website totally destroys your pitiful spammed argument and you as a person.

That isn't poroof of anything other than you believing any old crap.

http://debunking-a-moron.blogspot.co.uk/2011/07/chinese-spacewalks-part-1.html

List the items on that webpage that don't satisfactorily answer your video.

Pitiful spam. There is no mountain, only puddles of skunk droppings.

Please explain how somebody who has spent nearly ten years making duplicate posts all around the web without considering evidence properly or debating in good faith can be considered sane. That's you by the way.

How come you haven't answered this:

http://www.politicalforum.com/moon-landing/441261-apollo-moon-hoax-film-makers-corrupt.html

And how come you keep ignoring this:

http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=443515&page=5&p=1065867045#post1065867045

As I said - I am "anyone" and you are full of it. You have had your butt kicked and are royally owned on that forum. How come you are the only one who can't see it?