Wave-particle duality

Discussion in 'The Cesspool' started by Ostronomos, Jul 28, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Ostronomos Banned Banned

    Messages:
    20
    In essence, it's a spiritual theory.
     
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. arfa brane call me arf Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,832
    Not wanting to cast any aspersions on your claim, but what does it say?

    Not very much?

    I doesn't, for instance, say anything about the mathematics involved. Or about why or how particle behaviour is related to physical things like temperature, or momentum, or anything real.
     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. martillo Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    896
    For me is like to say that some animal have been discovered to behave sometimes as a fly sometimes as a whale.
    It only shows something very badly solved or unsolved thing in Physics.
    The solution: http://www.geocities.ws/anewlightinphysics/
    Yet to be proven, of course.
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Crunchy Cat F-in' *meow* baby!!! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,423
    I think you have this subforum confused with Religion or Pseudoscience.
     
  8. przyk squishy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,203
    Er, no, "wave-particle duality" is just a statement of fact: we observe quantum particles to behave like classical particles in some respects, and behave like waves in other respects. That's not a theory; it's just a raw desrciption of what we observe.

    Quantum mechanics is a theory which models quantum particles as a completely new type of object, which is neither a wave nor a classical particle, but which correctly predicts the particle and wavelike behaviour we see in experiments, as well as behaviour that doesn't really fit in either category.


    If it's yet to be proven, how do you know it is a viable solution?
     
  9. martillo Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    896
    And mine is the correspondent raw comment on your raw description.

    To be proven mainly experimentally for otherones. Different people demands different proofs.
    Some experiments are proposed for example in sections 4.6 (http://www.geocities.ws/anewlightinphysics/sections/Section4-6_About_Feynman_experiment.htm) and 6.4 (http://www.geocities.ws/anewlightinphysics/sections/Section6-4_The_experiment_as_a_proof.htm).
    My work is theoretical and theoretically it shows working.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page