I don't even remember what the arguments for it being fake are. however, I bet they don't stand up to good ol'fashioned sciforum thinkin' Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
The only output my brain can now come up to is: OH NO!, NOT AGAIN!! How many fake moonlanding threads do we have? Do we really need yet another one? Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Please take your nonsense away from here. We try to deal with reality based individuals not those off their rockers. Find another home for your ignorance and lack of fundamental education.
Erm lemme see now - Technology for a start - hell - they cant even keep a shuttle up today let alone send a rocket up and land on the moon 36 years ago. Your home computer is more powerful and advanced than anything like NASAs 1969 model. Hell - I hate stating the bloody obvious!!!!! Wake up and smell the coffee - it was a cold war affair, and as fake as shit. Next you'll be believing in Santa....LOL Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
The shuttle wasn't ment to stay up for long periods of time however the ISS was. It now is over 7 years old and doing fine about 120 miles above the Earth. Do you think that too is fake?
silly stu, the russians well monitored the moon voyage if the usa had cheated, russians would have been the first ones to notice that and at the era of cold war be very sure that they would have shouted very loud about that indeed now please go to sleep, wake up with a clearer mind
Well I only hope for Americas sake that when man actually does land on the moon (I hope it wont be America too) that remnants of the so called previous landings are still there. Egg on Americas face is the future - Don't have nightmares Avatar.
By the way - What fantastic technology America had in '69. Anyone care to tell me about it. How it managed to guide man and allow him to land on the moon - or was it another Dan Dare project, typically American.
So what went wrong with the shuttle Cosmic - gee - with all that technology America has surely it wouldn't have happened - or would it? Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Evidently you just like to troll for excited people who want to argue with you. If you are that ignorant of NASA and its accomlishments then please write to them and let them know how ignorant you are.
they are called rockets. http://science.howstuffworks.com/rocket1.htm you want people to find the remnants of our landings to prove we didn't go there? that makes no sense. I was going to respond more, but you are not worth the breath. can we ban people for being ignorant?
A small correction, Cato, if you please. Instead of ignorant, the word you wanted is stupid. Ignorance can be fixed - stupid is forever.
butts are forever ,too. unless you have a colostymie bag. the moon landing was as fake as the 2000 election.
HA-HA-HA! See what I mean about "forever?" Also interesting Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! that you compared yourself to a butt! Question. Not that you can't find a lot to read and film footage, but tell me - were you even around in 1969? I really doubt it.
I'd bet (s)he wasn't around in 1979 (possibly even 89)! As you said, though, there is lots of information available. A certain level of maturity and clarity of thought IS required to take in and process the information, however.