No teens on myspace, perhaps, but there would be membership. Many people who post here are from science and would prefer more posting on science. We're weeding out the undesirables as we speak. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Well, I will kind of miss those coloured cards. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! But seriously, a generally bad mod could be evaluated and possibly replaced, while a very good one might be elevated in their place. By making the directorate responsive to the electorate, wouldn't the common good be served? VOTING REALLY ROCKS! YOU SHOULD ALL SUPPORT VOTING FOR MODS
What if we had a system in which an overwhelming majority had to vote to add/remove a mod eg 51% would not be enough, but 80% would be (minimum)
The assumption being that what is perceived as a "bad mod" by the members is also perceived as a bad mod by the admin. Its position by committee not mob rule.
I'm sorry, friend Nickelodeon. I will make this a poll immediately. PLEASE SELECT "I WANT MODS TO BE VOTED IN" FROM THE AVAILABLE OPTIONS. YOU DON'T WANT THE "SHOCKY STICK" AGAIN, DO YOU? I really think this is a good idea. Isn't that what decent stewardship is about? Responsibility?
The analogy of this forum is of being a guest at a hosted party. You can enjoy yourself, but not pee on the carpet. And if the host says no, it's not put to vote.
Also, a poll will have to be held every month or so about whether a poll should be held on whether any mod should be removed. (apologies for bad English.. i think ..Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!)
But the hosts are selected from among the guests. HONESTLY, CAN ANYONE HEAR ME? YOU'RE STILL NOT CHANGING YOUR POSITIONS. VOTING IS GRRRREAT!
It will still be so, the only difference would be that the host has been chosen by the majority. Of course new members can't vote until they have been a member for some time.
