USOs

Discussion in 'UFOs, Ghosts and Monsters' started by Magical Realist, Jun 17, 2016.

  1. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,219
    Defies reason!!??

    It would seem the commentator (and thus MR) have lived in a 2-dimensional world their whole lives.

    For Pete's sake. One disappears behind the other. You can actually see where the "larger" one eclipses the "smaller" one.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Shame the video stops right there, isn't it? I guess the film editor didn't feel that the next couple of frames (where the farther one re-emerges from behind the nearer one) would be of any interest to analysts...

    This is an excellent example of manipulation of narrative for the purpose of sensationalisation.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    31,445
    Credulous, you mean. You won't discuss it with anybody who is sceptical.

    Do you have any videos of actual UFOs?

    Poor quality videos of uncertain provenance cut so as to give a false impression speak for themselves. Videos that show objects that could be any number of things speak for themselves. Faked videos speak for themselves. But to hear what any of them are saying, you must first open your mind.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. river

    Messages:
    11,058

    No , James R

    Just Won't discuss with anyone who has not read up on the topic . At least some what . Quote a page in a book etc.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,219
    What you mean is "Won't discuss with anyone who has not read up on the topic - and come to the same conclusions as you.
     
  8. Magical Realist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,625
  9. Beer w/Straw Transcendental Ignorance! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,107
    Daecon likes this.
  10. Michael 345 Bali in Nov closer Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,229
    Great assuming
    Never did get a answer re helicopter incident moving from 0 to 600 klm and back to 0 in a couple of seconds

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  11. Michael 345 Bali in Nov closer Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,229
    Actually that is the only one of your post i find credible

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  12. Michael 345 Bali in Nov closer Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,229
    I've seen that type of merging many times
    Very very briefly you see the trailing aircraft (yes I am going to call it a aircraft) raise up and later dip down and merge

    Spent a bit of time looking for a suitable refueling mid air video but couldn't find one out of focus and grainey enough to convince MR it was a authentic alien spacecraft

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  13. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,818
    They were teasing Newton's ghost.
     
  14. Michael 345 Bali in Nov closer Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,229
    More like scaring the brown stuff out of him

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  15. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,818
    Seventy years, no evidence.
     
  16. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,818
    But they demonstrate a belief in pre-Newtonian thinking. You know, "magic".
     
  17. river

    Messages:
    11,058
    Not convinced , don't actually care .

    The only thing that really matters is evidence , and when investigated by people who actually have a real solid interest in this subject , thinking becomes knowing .
     
  18. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,818
    Wishful thinking becomes pseudo"knowing".
     
  19. river

    Messages:
    11,058
    Then there is nothing for you to add , so why bother responding since it's , " pseudo knowing " ?

    The difference between thinking and knowing , is that thinking does not know , knowing , is about information .
     
    Last edited: Dec 27, 2017
  20. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,818
    Google Translate fails me.
     
  21. river

    Messages:
    11,058
    Not surprised

    But I am surprised you can't figure it out .

    Tough beans though , its not complicated at all , so figure it out . My post#156 is really quite easy .
     
  22. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,818
    You may be impressed with your babble, but I'm not. I am forwarding some of them to my Psych prof.
     

Share This Page