US compensation for dead Iraqis

Discussion in 'Politics' started by S.A.M., Jan 18, 2008.

?

US should pay compensation for death/imjury of Iraqis due to occupation

  1. Yes

    15.0%
  2. No

    60.0%
  3. Don't know

    5.0%
  4. Some other opinion

    20.0%
  1. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    Like in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait?

    Pull the other one.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Mr.Spock Back from the dead Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,938
    saudi arabia that supports terror, indonesia, the muslim brotherhood.....muslims are known for their love to western states and values, with the US in the front.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    Yeah, so when are they being invaded?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Mr.Spock Back from the dead Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,938
    i think the americans has had enough of fighting when the rest of the self righteous western world criticizes them for everything.

    until the terrorists strike again that is, maybe a british airport?
     
  8. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    Or an Indian railway? Maybe we should attack a totally irrelevant country everytime there is an attack.
     
  9. Mr.Spock Back from the dead Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,938
    but you muslims do.
     
  10. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    Stereotyping from a Jew? Thats a laugh!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  11. Mr.Spock Back from the dead Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,938
    so muslims dont blow up in the name of allah? ill bet you got an explosive belt hidden somewhere.
     
  12. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    I took my Beano today.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  13. Mr.Spock Back from the dead Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,938
    ill bet youre deadly with an ak47.
     
  14. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    I prefer nagging. It gets more results. And you can do it all over again the next day

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  15. iceaura Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    30,994
    There was the small matter of ten years of embargo on exactly that stuff.

    Probably made a bit more difference than a few gold toilets. Especially considering Saddam was able get all that infrastructure installed and running fine, along with the gold toilets, before the blockade.

    If the families of the dead children from the sanctions are due compensation, the bill is going to be large.
     
  16. superstring01 Moderator

    Messages:
    12,110
    The sanctions were legally passed, UN resolutions. How could that possibly come to be, except if the entier Security Council all chip in. Which I doubt.

    ~String
     
  17. iceaura Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    30,994
    I doubt anyone expects it to come to be. LIke Russian or US reparations for Afghanistan, it's pipe dreaming.

    But as far as moral debt, the devil is in the details: it was the US that made sure things like anesthesia, prosthetics, medical supplies, water treatment chlorine, disinfectant, etc, were on the banned list. And the US that set up a ridiculous bureaucracy to slow down what wasn't possible to ban for PR reasons. And the US that provided the muscle.
     
  18. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    Why did the US put these things on the banned list? Apart from the deaths of 500,000 children due to lack of basic medication, what did they hope to achieve?
     
  19. Asguard Kiss my dark side Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    23,049
    I can only speculate but maybe they thought if they made things so bad the iraqies would get rid of sudam. Its a brutal way to get what you want though
     
  20. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    What precedent were they using for this assumption? Or was it, like every other decision they make, a random act of ignorance?
     
  21. Buffalo Roam Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,931
    Provide citation of such actions.
     
  22. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
  23. (Q) Encephaloid Martini Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,855
    Absolutely not. The question is loaded and makes no specifics whatsoever.

    Looks more like another Americanophobe thread.
     

Share This Page