US air strikes kill 140 civilians in Afghanistan, including 93 children

Discussion in 'World Events' started by DiamondHearts, May 15, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. mikenostic Stop pretending you're smart! Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,624
    Because those governments that they 'want' often pose a threat to that region or sometimes the whole world. And (I hate it for you but) the West will not tolerate those regimes. Look at Saddam, he got unruly and started threatening the region, so look what we did. Hopefully the Taliban members are next. I hope Pakistan ruins their shit somethin proper.


    IF
    But they're not. So why all the hypothetical bullshit?
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    The airstrikes are not by the Taliban. The dead children are really dead. Thats perspective.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. (Q) Encephaloid Martini Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,834
    There you have your answer.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. (Q) Encephaloid Martini Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,834
    Well, you see, you can't translate the English instructions into Arabic, the instructions that said for them to NOT hide behind the children.

    Oh well...
     
  8. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    Don't worry, its not reached 500,000 yet. The price is till waiting to be worth it.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  9. (Q) Encephaloid Martini Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,834
    Gee, I guess they soon won't have any more children to hide behind. What will they do?
     
  10. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    Why you can pick up the remains of the children and secular humanise them to death!
     
  11. fedr808 1100101 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,706
    So long as the Taliban fire a single bullet from a school, wedding, village.

    It is perfectly legal to bomb that area.

    Because of the fact that the instant a neutral target shoots at the enemy the neutral target becomes a hostile target indefinitely.
     
  12. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    Of course.

    If you search under this kid, you'll find the militant it was worth burning him for
     
  13. fedr808 1100101 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,706
    so long as that militant fired a single bullet it no longer matters if there is a kid there or not.
     
  14. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    Clearly.
     
  15. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    The few voices of sanity [which will be subdued in all those jerking off to the snuff videos of civilians dying]

    http://www.morningstaronline.co.uk/index.php/world/us_set_to_spend_100m_more_on_wars
     
  16. spidergoat Liddle' Dick Tater Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    53,966
    If we had more troops in there, we might not have to use air power alone. But I guess you would call that evil too. If the Taliban should win, are we going to read you condemn their atrocities too? I doubt it.
     
  17. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    I think what the Taliban will or will not do is irrelevant here:

    "What is the number of dead and injured at which you will say: 'This can't go on'?"
     
  18. fedr808 1100101 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,706
    How many do you have?

    JK

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    ,

    But you see here, is that the Taliban are using them as human shields. So if anything they are defying international law.
     
  19. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    So when your father comes home he is "using you as a human shield"? When your brother drops you to school, you're a "human shield"?

    Does anyone realise how ludicrous the notion that people who are born in the villages that they die in are using their family as human shields by living there?

    How can any educated thinking person buy this shipload of shit?
     
  20. fedr808 1100101 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,706
    Im sorry but I have no idea what you mean by your two examples.

    But the fact is that the Taliban operate in neutral zones, that means literally they are using human shields
     
  21. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    If they "operate in neutral zones" why are they fighting the Afghan troops maintained by the puppet government ?
     
  22. fedr808 1100101 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,706
    What does that have to do with the fact they are in neutral zones?

    It doesnt make a difference, neutral is neutral.
     
  23. (Q) Encephaloid Martini Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,834
    They don't buy YOUR shipload of shit.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page